Wire Loop in Equilibrium-Angle?

  • Thread starter Thread starter GingerBread27
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Loop Wire
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on determining the equilibrium angle of a rectangular wire loop in a magnetic field. The loop, with dimensions 13.5 cm by 6.85 cm, carries a current of 0.20 Amps and is subjected to a vertical magnetic field of 0.30 T. To achieve equilibrium, the sum of vertical forces, including the weight of two 8.05 g masses and the magnetic force, must equal zero. The analysis reveals that the torque from the weights and the magnetic force balance out when the loop hangs vertically, resulting in an equilibrium angle of 0°. Thus, the loop remains in a vertical position without any angle when in equilibrium.
GingerBread27
Messages
108
Reaction score
0
The diagram on your assignment depicts a rectangular wire loop of width a = 13.5 cm and height b = 6.85 cm, that is connected to a current source that when turned on, gives rise to a current I = 0.20 Amps in the wire. The loop is suspended in a uniform magnetic field B = 0.30 T that points in a vertical direction as shown in the diagram, and it would hang vertically if there were no current in the wire. We assume that the wire is massless, but two masses m = 8.05 g are suspended at the lower corners. What is the angle (in °), theta, at which the loop is in equilibrium?


Ok I know that the sum of the forces and the torque need to equal zero for this system to be in equilibrium, after that I'm lost. How do I get started with this problem?
 

Attachments

  • prob18.gif
    prob18.gif
    1.8 KB · Views: 625
Physics news on Phys.org
What force is applied to the 4 sides the loop by the interaction between the magnetic field and the current?

What torque does the magnetic field apply to the current carrying wires depending on angle?

What torque do the two masses apply depending on angle?

What angle are these two torques equal and opposite?
 


To begin solving this problem, we can use the fact that the loop is in equilibrium to set up equations for the sum of forces and torque. Since the loop is not moving, the sum of forces in the vertical direction must equal zero, and the sum of forces in the horizontal direction must also equal zero. Additionally, the torque about any point must also equal zero.

First, let's consider the sum of forces in the vertical direction. The only forces acting in this direction are the weight of the masses and the magnetic force. The weight of the masses can be calculated using the formula F = mg, where m is the mass and g is the acceleration due to gravity. Since there are two masses, the total weight is 2mg. The magnetic force can be calculated using the formula F = ILB, where I is the current, L is the length of the wire, and B is the magnetic field. In this case, L is equal to the height of the loop b. So the equation for the sum of forces in the vertical direction is:

2mg - ILB = 0

Next, let's consider the sum of forces in the horizontal direction. The only force acting in this direction is the tension in the wire. Since the wire is massless, the tension is the same throughout the wire. So the equation for the sum of forces in the horizontal direction is:

T = 0

Finally, let's consider the torque about the point where the wire is suspended. The torque is equal to the force multiplied by the distance from the point of rotation. In this case, the force is the weight of the masses, and the distance is the width of the loop a. So the equation for the torque is:

2mga = 0

Now we have a system of three equations with three unknowns (T, I, and theta). We can solve for these unknowns using algebraic manipulation. Once we have the values for T and I, we can use them to find the value of theta.

After solving the equations, we get the following values:

T = 0
I = 0.20 Amps
theta = 0°

This means that the loop is in equilibrium when it is hanging vertically, with no angle. This makes sense since the sum of forces and torque are equal to zero, and the loop is not moving.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top