Within ourselves, does blood have an expiry date?

  • Thread starter Thread starter rowkem
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Blood
AI Thread Summary
Blood has a limited lifespan, with red blood cells lasting about three months before being expelled through feces, contributing to its color. This process is particularly useful for diabetics, as the concentration of sugar in hemoglobin reflects blood sugar levels over time, allowing for effective monitoring through the HbA1c test. Plasma circulates through the kidneys, where about 25% of blood is directed, filtering out waste products like urea while reabsorbing essential materials to maintain homeostasis. Other blood components, such as lymphocytes and macrophages, also circulate and are processed by the liver, which breaks down cellular debris and recycles elemental components. Waste products, especially fat-soluble ones, are excreted via bile into the gut. The discussion highlights the complexity of blood processing and the body's efficient waste management systems.
rowkem
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
I would assume that blood, within us, is only good for so long but, I could be wrong. Also, if it does become "bad", where does it go? How do we get rid of "garbage blood"?
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Red blood cells last about 3 months and then die. They are expelled in the feces. That is partly what gives feces its characteristic colour.

(BTW, their limited lifespan is of great use to Diabetics. Sugar buillds up in the Hemoglobin of RBCs in direct proportion to its levels in the body. As these RBCs are replenished, their concentration reflects a history of the body's sugar levels. By doing a test callled HbA1c, doctors can get a very good idea of how a patient's blood sugars have been doing over the previous three months. This is of much greater use than any number of on-the-spot tests.)
 
The plasma is circulated through the kidneys (25% of the blood is directed there), corresponding to 130 liters/day. Molecules smaller than (approximately) albumin enter the ultrafiltrate and pass through nephrons, where material is selectively reabsorbed to maintain homeostasis, and waste products (small molecules like urea, sodium, etc) excreted.

That's a good question about other blood products- lymphocytes, macrophages, neutrophils, all kinds of cells, cell fragments, proteins, lipoproteins... circulate. I don't know how material passes from the blood to the gut. That's actually a really good question...
 
I took this over to a colleague and discussed.

Ok- there are two main routes of things out of the body, either via the kidney or via the liver (bile acids). Cellular debris, from lysed cells or whatever, is processed in the liver and broken back down into the elemental components- the same process happens, to some degree, in each cell (proteosomes, lysosomes, endosomes..) and the components re-used as much as possible.

Fat soluable wastes in particular, are put into the bile and excreted into the ileum and moves along the gut. Hemoglobin is broken down in the liver and re-used; the 'life cycle' of iron in the body is marginally understood.

What's amazing is not how little we know, it's how much we *do* know.
 
Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S. According to articles in the Los Angeles Times, "Chagas disease, long considered only a threat abroad, is established in California and the Southern U.S.", and "Kissing bugs bring deadly disease to California". LA Times requires a subscription. Related article -...
I am reading Nicholas Wade's book A Troublesome Inheritance. Please let's not make this thread a critique about the merits or demerits of the book. This thread is my attempt to understanding the evidence that Natural Selection in the human genome was recent and regional. On Page 103 of A Troublesome Inheritance, Wade writes the following: "The regional nature of selection was first made evident in a genomewide scan undertaken by Jonathan Pritchard, a population geneticist at the...
Back
Top