WKB and perturbation theory.

tpm
Messages
67
Reaction score
0
for a Hamiltonian H=H_0 + \epsilon V(x)

my question is (for small epsilon) can WKB and perturbative approach give very different solutions ?? to energies eigenvalues and so on the index '0' means that is the Hamiltonian of a free particle.

problem arises perhaps in calculation of:

\int \mathcal D [x] exp(iS[x]/\hbar)

with the action S[x]=S_0 [x] +\epsilon V[x]

here the main problem is that in perturbation theory the functional integral may be divergent (due to IR and UV divergences) but in WKB (semiclassical approach) the integral can be 'calculated' (given finite meaning),

hence i'd like to know if at least for perturbative case you can use WKB approach (with some re-scaled constant) to deal with perturbation theory..note that for the 'free particle' no interaction WKB gives exact methods..thankx.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Technically, WKB and "perturbation theory" are both perturbative expansions in what are presumed to be "small quantities". In the case of your "perturbation theory", the small parameter is the \epsilon, whereas in the WKB approximation, you have expanded the propagator to first order in \hbar, so evidently the total action of the trajectories is large compared to Planck's constant, which sets the scale for action in quantum mechanics.

Thus, you can get two very different answers depending on what exactly is "small".
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top