Work and Distance: Is Work Done Without Acceleration?

  • Thread starter Thread starter richardbsmith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether work is done when a body is moved without acceleration. It clarifies that while force requires mass and acceleration, work can still occur if a force is applied, even at constant speed, as long as it overcomes opposing forces like friction. When moving at constant speed, the net work done is zero, but work can be done by specific forces. The conversation emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between net force and net work to understand these concepts better. Ultimately, work involves applying force over a distance, which can add energy to an object.
richardbsmith
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
If there is no acceleration, is there work done when a body is moved through a distance? Force requires mass and acceleration. Without acceleration then no force, no work?

Then if a body is moved at constant speed, is there any work done?

What if the body is moved at constant speed against friction? Is there acceleration because the movement, even though it is a constant speed and is in equilibrium, must have a constant push to continue the movement?

First time user. I tried searching for this specific question, found several related and helpful answers. But did not find a complete answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
richardbsmith said:
If there is no acceleration, is there work done when a body is moved through a distance? Force requires mass and acceleration. Without acceleration then no force, no work?
You can certainly have a force without acceleration. (Push against the wall, for example.) You can't have a net force without an acceleration.

Then if a body is moved at constant speed, is there any work done?
Work done by what? Are you pushing it along? Constant speed tells you that there is no net work done, considering all forces, but you can certainly have work done by a specific force.

What if the body is moved at constant speed against friction? Is there acceleration because the movement, even though it is a constant speed and is in equilibrium, must have a constant push to continue the movement?
As long as it's going in a straight line, there's no acceleration.
 
The constant speed that I intended in the question would be from a constant force needed to overcome, say friction. Moving a mouse over a mouse pad. Is there work done if the mouse is moved with constant vector motion?

The distinction of net force and net work will help me work through this. :)

Thanks,
 
richardbsmith said:
The constant speed that I intended in the question would be from a constant force needed to overcome, say friction. Moving a mouse over a mouse pad. Is there work done if the mouse is moved with constant vector motion?
If you are exerting a force on the mouse (in the direction it moves), then you are doing work on it. (Of course the net work on the mouse is zero, since friction is doing negative work on it.)
 
Doc Al.
Thanks for the clarification. I think it is becoming more clear. I'll get a better handle as I practice the problems. I do with that some of these texts would make it clearer that work as force through distance, is more than moving a body through a distance. It is adding energy, accelerating and object, through a distance. Velocity increases, or decreases, or there is no work.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top