Work and Potential Energy: To the Moon physics problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics problem involving the calculations needed to determine the minimum speed required to reach the moon from Earth. The initial speed given is 5534 m/s, but the correct minimum speed is identified as 11068 m/s. Participants debate the factors affecting this minimum velocity, concluding that the mass of the Earth and its radius are relevant, while the mass of the spaceship is not. There are also discussions about the correct application of gravitational potential energy equations and the importance of understanding the physical meaning of each term in the equations used. Clarifications are sought regarding the gravitational potential energy at different points, emphasizing the need for accurate equation setup.
Zeus5966
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Part 1(complete and correct. I'm including this for context's sake) You plan to take a trip to the moon. Since you do not have a traditional spaceship with rockets, you will need to leave the Earth with enough speed to make it to the moon.

You leave the surface of the Earth at v = 5534m/s. How far from the center of the Earth will you get?


8447116.43

2)Since that is not far enough, you consult a friend who calculates (correctly) the minimum speed needed as vmin=11068m/s. How fast will you be moving at the surface of the moon?

Variables:
Vmoon = ?
Vmin = 11068m/s

3) Which of the following would change the minimum velocity needed to make it to the moon? (I'm pretty sure this is correct, however let me know if I'm wrong)
Mass of the Earth *True*
Radius of the Earth *True*
Mass of the spaceship *False*

Homework Equations


Ue = -(G*Me*m)/rem where rem is the radius of the Earth plus the distance between Earth and moon
Kf = (1/2)mVf^2
Ki = (1/2)mVi^2
Um = -(G*Mm*m)/rm where rm is the radius of the moon

Where Me is the mass of earth, Mm is the mass of the moon, m is the mass of the spaceship(which does not matter as it will be canceled in all terms) and Vi is the minimum escape velocity needed.

The Attempt at a Solution


Part 2
Ue + Ki = Um + Kf
Ue - Um + Ki = Kf
-G*Me/(rem) - -G*Me/(rm) + V^2/2 = Vf^2/2
√2*(-G*Me/(rem) - -G*Me/(rm) + V^2/2) = Vf
Calculating this gives me 21365.16m/s which is an incorrect answer.

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zeus5966 said:
Ue + Ki = Um + Kf
Ue - Um + Ki = Kf
-G*Me/(rem) - -G*Me/(rm) + V^2/2 = Vf^2/2
√2*(-G*Me/(rem) - -G*Me/(rm) + V^2/2) = Vf
Calculating this gives me 21365.16m/s which is an incorrect answer.

Your equation is incorrect. Do you know what the meaning of Ue is when you equate it with G*Mem/(rem) ?

It is important to understand the physical meaning of every terms in order to write the equation correctly.
 
This is the third time I've attempted to post this today... Not sure if it's getting through or not, but I was on a mobile device, maybe it didn't go through. Anyway, is Ue in fact the gravitational potential energy in terms of the radius of the Earth only, and Um is the gravitational potential energy of the distance between the Earth and the moon's surfaces? But then where does the gravitational potential energy of the moon come into play?
 
Sorry, for some reason your posts landed in moderation. Approved the last one only.
 
Zeus5966 said:
This is the third time I've attempted to post this today... Not sure if it's getting through or not, but I was on a mobile device, maybe it didn't go through. Anyway, is Ue in fact the gravitational potential energy in terms of the radius of the Earth only, and Um is the gravitational potential energy of the distance between the Earth and the moon's surfaces? But then where does the gravitational potential energy of the moon come into play?

Wow..it must be a hard time for you.

Have you learned about electric field generated by an electric charge? It is analogous to the gravitational field. For example, you will find the equation for electrostatic force ##F=k\frac{Qq}{r^2}## very similar to the equation ##F=G\frac{Mm}{r^2}##. I find it personally useful for me to understand the gravitational field when I view it as something similar to a electric field.

Anyways, according to your equation, Ue is the gravitational potential energy at a certain point, and you should know where the point is. Do you?

After you understand exactly what your Ue is, go back to look at the equation (Ue + Ki = Um + Kf) you set up and translate it to words. It should be something like "The gravitational potential energy at point X plus initial kinetic energy equal to ..." After doing so, you should clearly see that the equation doesn't make sense.

How would you make adjustment to your equation then ?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top