Work done by a constant force homework

AI Thread Summary
Jennifer lifts a 2.5 kg carton of cat litter to a height of 0.75 m, leading to a calculated work of 18.4 Joules using the formula Work = PE = mg.y. However, the textbook states the answer is 0, which confuses the student. Clarification suggests that while the lifting process requires a force, the work done on the carton itself may be misinterpreted due to the nature of the lifting force. The discussion emphasizes that regardless of how the carton was lifted, the potential energy gained remains the same, resulting in consistent work done. The confusion primarily arises from the interpretation of the problem rather than the calculations themselves.
paxian
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Jennifer lifts a 2.5 kg carton of cat litter from the floor to a height of 0.75 m.
(a) How much total work is done on the carton during this operation?

Homework Equations


Work=PE=mg.y


The Attempt at a Solution


Work = 2.5kg*9.8m/s^2*0.57m= 18.4J

However the answer in the back of the book is 0? I don't know how they get to that answer? Please help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how they determined 0 either.

Perhaps we could be pedantic and say that work was done on the 2.5 kg of kitty litter, and that very little was done on the comparatively-weightless carton itself? :smile:
 
paxian said:

Homework Statement



Jennifer lifts a 2.5 kg carton of cat litter from the floor to a height of 0.75 m.
(a) How much total work is done on the carton during this operation?

Homework Equations


Work=PE=mg.y


The Attempt at a Solution


Work = 2.5kg*9.8m/s^2*0.57m= 18.4J

However the answer in the back of the book is 0? I don't know how they get to that answer? Please help!

I believe your answer is correct [though you typed 0.57 rather than 0.75 in your post, but clearly calculated correctly. Make sure you looked up the correct answer.
 
PeterO said:
I believe your answer is correct [though you typed 0.57 rather than 0.75 in your post, but clearly calculated correctly. Make sure you looked up the correct answer.

I looked at the right answer... there is part b to this question and that part is consistent with my answer from the back of the book!
 
On a separate aspect, the title you have used here is not a good choice. The box of litter requires a "constant force" to support it only while it is moving with constant acceleration (this includes sitting on the floor, which is an acceleration of zero). We aren't told how the box was lifted; it's very unlikely it was lifted with a constant force. It doesn't matter how fast or slow or erratically it was lifted, it still gains the same P.E. so the same amount of work is done.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top