How Much Work Does a Plane's Engine Perform to Reach 3200m at 65m/s?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the minimum work done by a plane's engine to ascend to 3200 meters while reaching a speed of 65 m/s. The plane's mass is 1500 kg, and the problem emphasizes the use of conservation of energy rather than kinematic equations. The key takeaway is that the change in kinetic energy and potential energy must be considered to find the total work done, which is calculated to be 5.0 x 10^7 joules. Participants clarify that potential energy is zero at ground level, and the energy is converted during ascent. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding energy conservation in solving such physics problems.
Some_Thing
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 1500 kg plane, initially at rest, leaves an airfield and a short time later it is at an elevation of 3200 m traveling at 65 m/s. What is the minimum work done by the plane's engine in this time? (Ignore air resistance)


Homework Equations



W=Fd, F=ma, and most certainly some other ones.


The Attempt at a Solution



This is what I understand from the question:

Vox = 0 m/s

Voy = 0 m/s

dy = 3200 m

m = 1500 kg

I assume that at 3200m, the plane starts to fly only horizontally, so "65 m/s" would be Vfx.


The problem is that this seems insufficient for any of the kinematics formulas, and I don't see how I could use it in different areas (like dynamics).


What am I missing here? Can someone please give me a push in the right direction?

Any help is greatly appreciated,

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinematic equations won't do you any good here. Can you tell me which quantity is conserved in this system?
 
Cyosis said:
Kinematic equations won't do you any good here. Can you tell me which quantity is conserved in this system?

Ah, I see, its one of those conservation of energy questions, isn't it?

Change in Ek + Change in Ep = the correct answer (5.0 x 10^7)

Thanks!


One thing bugs me though. Shouldn't these two add up to 0?
 
Some_Thing said:
Ah, I see, its one of those conservation of energy questions, isn't it?

Change in Ek + Change in Ep = the correct answer (5.0 x 10^7)

Thanks!


One thing bugs me though. Shouldn't these two add up to 0?

Why would they add up to zero?

There is no potential energy on the ground. The change in kinetic energy on the ground is converted to potential energy at 3200m in the air and kinetic energy to make it travel at 65m/s
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top