.Work Done by an Ideal Gas - Derivation and Implications

AI Thread Summary
The work done by an ideal gas is expressed as the integral of pressure with respect to volume, and when the final volume is less than the initial volume, the work done by the gas is negative, indicating that work is done on the gas by an external agent. This relationship aligns with Newton's third law, where the work done on the gas is equal in magnitude but opposite in sign to the work done by the gas. The first law of thermodynamics illustrates that energy transfer can occur through work or heat, complicating the understanding of energy changes in the system. When the gas's volume decreases, it can lead to an increase in temperature, demonstrating the interplay between work and thermal energy. Overall, the discussion clarifies that both positive and negative work can occur, depending on the direction of energy transfer.
jpas
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
The expression for the work done by an ideal gas is:

\int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV

But what if V_f \prec V_i? If W \prec 0 does that mean

1) work is done on the gas or

2)on this case, W= - \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV so that W \succ 0 and W still means the work done by the gas?

Note: The question may seem obvious but the derivation of the above expression only makes sense for work done by the gas
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the volume decreases, then the gas does negative work on the environment, which also means that the environment does positive work on the gas.

<br /> \int_{V_i}^{V_f} P dV <br />
is always the work done by the gas (but it can be a positive or negative value). Also:
<br /> W_{on gas} = -W_{by gas}<br />
which is a direct result of Newton's third law.
 
JaWiB,

I think I got it. According to what you said, when we say, in thermodynamics, that work is done by the system only when

W \succ 0

this is not true. Positive work done by the system is when W \succ 0 and negative work done by the system is when W \prec 0.

Somehow, this a bit more confusing than the previous formulation: W \succ 0 - work by the system; W \prec 0 work on the system.

Any thoughts on how to make it clearer?
 
jpas said:
what if V_f \prec V_i? If W \prec 0 does that mean

1) work is done on the gas

Yes. Some external agent must do work in order to decrease the volume. The agent does work on the gas during this process. By the way, the work done by the agent is ultimately manifest as an increase in gas temperature.
 
jpas said:
Any thoughts on how to make it clearer?

The first law of thermodynamics: {\Delta}U = Q - W
when W is the work done by the system. If W is positive, and no heat is transferred to the system, then it loses energy (and this is often manifest as a decrease in temperature).

The way you're thinking about it might be problematic because it is tempting to think of work as a one-way process: either the work done by the system is positive and the environment gains energy or the work done on the system is positive and the system gains energy. In reality, if the system gains energy the environment loses energy, and if the environment gains energy then the system loses energy.
 
By the way, the work done by the agent is ultimately manifest as an increase in gas temperature.
Not necessarily. The gas can also lose energy on the form of heat such that Q=W.


JaWiB,

Good explanation. Though at first it seemed confusing, I think I got it now.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top