Calculating Work Done on a Block Moving Up an Incline

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done on a block moving up a 30° incline under the influence of three forces: F1 (40N horizontal), F2 (20N normal to the plane), and F3 (30N parallel to the plane). The calculations for work done by each force were presented, with WF1 calculated as 27.7J, WF2 as 8J (noting that no work is done by normal force since it acts perpendicular to the motion), and WF3 as 24J since it is aligned with the motion. Clarifications were made regarding the need for trigonometric adjustments for forces not aligned with the direction of motion. The discussion emphasizes understanding the direction of forces in relation to the incline when calculating work done.
myk127
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A block moves up a 30° incline under the action of certain forces, three of which are as follows: F1 is horizontal and magnitude 40N. F2 is normal to the plane and of magnitude 20N. F3 is parallel to the plane and of magnitude 30N. Determine the work done by each force as the block moves 80cm up the incline



Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I just need to know if I'm doing the right thing here.
WF1 = 40(cos 30)(0.8) = 27.7
WF2 = 20(sin 30)(0.8) = 8
WF3 = 30(0.8) = 24
 
Physics news on Phys.org
myk127 said:

Homework Statement


A block moves up a 30° incline under the action of certain forces, three of which are as follows: F1 is horizontal and magnitude 40N. F2 is normal to the plane and of magnitude 20N. F3 is parallel to the plane and of magnitude 30N. Determine the work done by each force as the block moves 80cm up the incline

Homework Equations



The Attempt at a Solution


I just need to know if I'm doing the right thing here.
WF1 = 40(cos 30)(0.8) = 27.7
WF2 = 20(sin 30)(0.8) = 8
WF3 = 30(0.8) = 24

Welcome to PF.

The first one looks good.

The second one says the force is normal to the plane. If the force is normal to the plane of the incline then there is no work done, because there is no component in the line of motion. I will presume that you are asked about normal to the plane the incline is on. If that is downward then I think you should treat the sin30 component as negative since it is acting against the direction of motion.
 
ah. thanks for that.
what about the F3? you don't have to multiply it to sin 30 becase it's parallel to the inclined right?
so it's like rotating the figure by 30°.
 
myk127 said:
ah. thanks for that.
what about the F3? you don't have to multiply it to sin 30 becase it's parallel to the inclined right?
so it's like rotating the figure by 30°.

Correct. It is fully in the direction of the motion. No trig required.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top