Work Done by Gravity on 265kg Load: 6.24x10^4 J

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the work done by gravity on a 265-kg load lifted 24.0 m with an acceleration of 0.190 g. The initial calculation of the force of gravity was correct, yielding 2.6 x 10^3 N, and the work done was calculated as 6.24 x 10^4 J using the angle of 0°. However, the correct answer should reflect the opposite sign due to the angle being 180°, as gravity acts downward while the displacement is upward. This highlights the importance of considering the direction of forces in work calculations. Understanding the relationship between force direction and displacement is crucial for accurate physics problem-solving.
PeachBanana
Messages
189
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 265-kg load is lifted 24.0 m vertically with an acceleration =0.190 g by a single cable.

Determine the work done by gravity on the load.


Homework Equations



Force of Gravity = mg
W = F * d * cos (theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I know why I did this incorrectly but I want to make sure.

First attempt: Force gravity = (265 kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 2.6 * 10^3 N.
W = (2.6 x 10^3 N) (24.0 m) * cos (0°)
W = 6.24 x 10^4 J.

The correct answer is the same magnitude but the opposite sign. Is that because the angle should have been 180° because gravity always points down? The displacement is up so therefore the angle between the net force and the displacement would have been 180°, not 0°?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PeachBanana said:

Homework Statement



A 265-kg load is lifted 24.0 m vertically with an acceleration =0.190 g by a single cable.

Determine the work done by gravity on the load.

Homework Equations



Force of Gravity = mg
W = F * d * cos (theta)

The Attempt at a Solution


I think I know why I did this incorrectly but I want to make sure.

First attempt: Force gravity = (265 kg)(9.8 m/s^2) = 2.6 * 10^3 N.
W = (2.6 x 10^3 N) (24.0 m) * cos (0°)
W = 6.24 x 10^4 J.

The correct answer is the same magnitude but the opposite sign. Is that because the angle should have been 180° because gravity always points down? The displacement is up so therefore the angle between the net force and the displacement would have been 180°, not 0°?
That looks fine. What's your question?
 
I did it incorrectly the first time but I wanted to make sure I knew why it was wrong.
 
Yes, if your displacement is in the positive direction, then in this case gravity must be in the opposite direction (180 degrees from positive direction).
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top