Work done during sandpaper application on horizontal surface

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done by kinetic friction while sanding a table, where the sandpaper is rubbed back and forth 30 times over a distance of 0.6 meters with a normal force of 1.5N and a coefficient of kinetic friction of 0.85. The calculated force of friction is 1.275N, leading to a total work done of 0.765J. Participants clarify that the work calculation is correct, emphasizing the importance of distinguishing between displacement and distance. It is noted that zero displacement does not imply zero work, as one can travel a distance without changing position. Understanding these concepts is crucial for accurate physics calculations.
Jbum
Messages
18
Reaction score
0
1. a table is being sanded. in the process, the sandpaper is rubbed back and forth 30 times over a distance of 0.6m. it is pressed against the table with a normal force of 1.5N, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.85. how much work is being done by the kinetic frictional force during this process? 2. W = Fd and f = N(uk)3. force of friction = 1.5N (0.85) = 1.275N

therefore, work = 1.275N (0.6m) = 0.765J

is this correctly done??and one more additional question as a side note: is it correct to say that no work is don't if the displacement from the original position is zero??thanks for the help.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Jbum said:
1. a table is being sanded. in the process, the sandpaper is rubbed back and forth 30 times over a distance of 0.6m. it is pressed against the table with a normal force of 1.5N, and the coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.85. how much work is being done by the kinetic frictional force during this process?


2. W = Fd and f = N(uk)


3. force of friction = 1.5N (0.85) = 1.275N

therefore, work = 1.275N (0.6m) = 0.765J

is this correctly done??





and one more additional question as a side note: is it correct to say that no work is don't if the displacement from the original position is zero??


thanks for the help.

Don't forget about the 30 times for the first part of the question.

For the second question (side note), no that is not correct. Don't confuse the term displacement with distance. They have two different meanings. You can have a zero displacement even though you traveled some distance. For example, walk around in a big circle until you reach your starting point. Your displacement is zero, but your distance is non-zero, hence your work would be non-zero.

CS
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top