Work done on the object problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter norcal
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Work Work done
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the work done on a 5.0 kg object with a position function defined as x = 3.0t - 4.0t^2 + 1.0t^3 over the time interval from t = 0 to t = 2.0 seconds. The displacement is calculated as -2 meters, leading to an initial work equation of W = Fd. However, there is a critical debate about the assumption that acceleration is constant and whether to use the change in kinetic energy instead. The hint suggests that the change in kinetic energy should be considered for a more accurate calculation of work done. The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly determining the force and acceleration before applying the work formula.
norcal
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A single force acts on a 5.0 kg particle-like object in such a way that the position of the object as a function of time is given by x = 3.0t - 4.0t^2 + 1.0t^3, with x in meters and t in seconds. Find the work done on the object by the force from t = 0 to t = 2.0 s.

Homework Equations



x=3.0t-4.0t^2+1t^3
W=Fd
W=integral(Fdx)

The Attempt at a Solution



So when t=0, x=0.
When t=2, x=-2
displacement= -2-0 = -2m

W=Fd
F=ma=(5)(9.8)=49

W=(49 N)(-2 m)
W= -98 J
 
Physics news on Phys.org
norcal said:
W=Fd
F=ma=(5)(9.8)=49
No. What makes you think that the acceleration equals 9.8? Is the acceleration even constant?

Hint: Consider the change in KE of the object.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top