Work Done, Uniformly Charged Ring

kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
Charge Q uniformly spread through the ring of radius a. Find the work done to bring point charge q from the center of ring to infinity along the axis through the center of ring.

From a previous problem I calculated E=kQz/(z^2+a^2)^1.5

I then tried to apply the formula W=eo/2\intE^2 dz integrating from 0 to infinity.

As a result I got -Q^2/(1024a^3).

However the professor on my paper just put an x on it, indicating that it was wrong & then wrote down use the formula W=q(Vo-Vinfinity).

So my question is, can I not apply the formula I used for the equation? If not, why?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
kuahji said:
I then tried to apply the formula W=eo/2\intE^2 dz integrating from 0 to infinity.

As a result I got -Q^2/(1024a^3).


The formula you are referring to is actually

U=\frac{\epsilon_0}{2}\int_{\text{all space}}E^2 d^3\textbf{r}

It gives the amount of energy stored in the fields. You could use it to calculate;

(1) the amount of energy stored in the fields when the point charge is at the center of the ring U_1

and

(2) the amount of energy stored in the fields when the point charge is at infinity U_2

and then conservation of energy would mean that the work done by the fields was W=U_1-U_2. But, in order to do this (since you integrate over all space), you would have to know the electric field due to both the ring and the point charge everywhere; not just on the axis of the ring.

It can be done this way, but it is MUCH easier to just calculate the potential due to the ring along its axis, and then use the formula your professor suggested.
 
Ok, I understand that you'd need to know the EF everywhere, but wouldn't it just be zero off the axis? Do to symmetry?
 
No, it would not be zero due to symmetry...off axis, there is no symmetry.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top