Work, Elastic and Kinetic Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the velocity of a 2.4 kg body under a force defined by Fx = -6x N as it moves along the x-axis. Participants clarify that the problem does not involve a spring, despite initial confusion regarding the spring constant. The correct approach involves using the work-energy principle, specifically integrating the force over the distance to find the work done. A sign error in the initial equations is identified, emphasizing the importance of correctly applying the work formula for variable forces. Ultimately, the participants confirm that the work done relates to the change in kinetic energy, leading to the correct calculation of the body's velocity at x = 4.0 m.
KMjuniormint5
Messages
66
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



The only force acting on a 2.4 kg body as it moves along the positive x-axis has an x component Fx = - 6x N, where x is in meters. The velocity of the body at x = 3.0 m is 8.0 m/s.
- What is the velocity of the body at x = 4.0 m?

Homework Equations


W = \Delta0.5*m*v^2
that is for kinetic

W = \Delta0.5kx^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I set the two equations equal to each other since no outside force is acting:
\Delta0.5*m*v^2 = -\Delta0.5kx^2 . . .
so . . . .
.5(2.4)(v^2) - .5(2.4)(8^2) = - .5(6)(3^2) - .5(6)(4^2)

is that right for the spring constant or is k = 6*x . . . .?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi KMjuniormint5,

I don't see a spring in this problem so you don't need the spring expression. You have the formula that shows the effect of the work on the kinetic energy. Now what is the formula for the work done by a force?
 
w = F*d where d is the distance but it is only in the x direction. . let me try that
 
so (-6)(4^2)-(-6)(3^2) = .5(2.4)(v^2)-.5(2.4)(8^2) and solve for v?
 
KMjuniormint5 said:
w = F*d where d is the distance but it is only in the x direction. . let me try that

That would apply for a constant force where the force and motion are in the same direction.

However, this force varies with x, so you need to use the integral form.
 
take the intergal of F*d? . . .
 
For a particle moving in the x direction, the work done is:

<br /> W \equiv \int\limits_{x_i}^{x_f} F_x \ dx<br />
 
so the force is going to .5*(-6)(x)^2 with xi = 3 and xf = 4
 
KMjuniormint5 said:
so the force is going to .5*(-6)(x)^2 with xi = 3 and xf = 4

(You said force, but I'm sure you meant work.) Yes, that will be the work done from xi to xf once you evaluate it with the limits. Once you have that you can relate it to the change in kinetic energy.

On looking back at this thread, I have to apologize. That force is the force of a spring, of course, so what we are doing will lead back to something like what you were doing in your first thread.

The work for a spring is:

<br /> W = -\frac{1}{2} k x_f^2 + \frac{1}{2}k x_i^2<br />

which is the kind of idea you had for the work done originally. You did have a sign error in that equation, but if you use the above you should get the correct sign.
 
  • #10
ok ya. . .i was just confused about the spring part because they said to use the spring equation. . .all i had wrong was the sign. . . thanks a lot!
 
Back
Top