Work/Energy and Parallel Current-Carrying Conductors (Conceptual Question)

AI Thread Summary
Two parallel conductors carrying current in the same direction attract each other, and as they move closer, they do work, raising questions about the source of this energy. The initial electrical energy in the wires transforms into negative magnetic potential energy when they attract, suggesting a conversion process. The work done by the forces involved does not contradict the principle that magnetic forces on moving charges do no work, as the change in the magnetic field induces an electric field. This induced electric field is responsible for the work done on the wires. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the interplay between electrical and magnetic energy in current-carrying conductors.
nautikal
Messages
19
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two parallel conductors carrying current in the same direction attract each other. If they are permitted to move toward each other, the forces of attraction do work. Where does the energy come from? Does this contradict the assertion in the previous chapter that magnetic forces on moving charges do no work? Explain.


Homework Equations


Right-hand rule.

Magnetic potential energy:
U = -\vec{\mu}\times\vec{B}

\vec{\mu} = I\vec{A}

The Attempt at a Solution



I understand how they attract each other, but not where the energy comes from. Before the wires move together, there is just electrical energy in the wires. Afterwards the two wires are together, and they have negative magnetic potential energy relative to the beginning. Does this mean that the magnetic potential energy turns into electrical potential energy of the wires? The only explanation I can really think of is that the work done by the two forces somehow cancels out. Could someone please explain this problem, because I'm getting more confused the more I think about it :).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Faraday's law states that a changing magnetic field induces an electric field. So, the moment the current is allowed to pass in the two wires, a magnetic field is created in a region where there was none previously. This change induces an electric field which is responsible for the work done on and by the wires.
So magnetic forces still do no work.
(Check out Griffiths' Introduction to Electrodynamics chapter 7 for a nice explanation)
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top