Work Energy Theorem for Variable Mass Systems

AI Thread Summary
The work-energy theorem can be applied to variable mass systems, such as rockets or train cars leaking water, by considering the entire system, including expelled mass. The mathematical basis involves integrating Newton's second law over infinitesimal displacements, accounting for the changing mass. Energy flux equations can be set up to relate the rates of work and energy loss to the kinetic energy change. While the theorem is generally accepted, specific derivations for variable mass systems are less common and require further exploration. Understanding this application enhances the comprehension of dynamics in systems with mass variation.
MuIotaTau
Messages
82
Reaction score
3
How do we know that the work-energy theorem holds for variable mass systems? Or rather, since I'm sure that we can at least know it to be true experimentally, what is the mathematical basis for the work-energy theorem? I know for fixed mass systems, a rather simple derivation comes from integration Newton's second law over an infinitesimal displacement, but I've never seen any sort of derivation of the relationship for variable mass systems, only the assumption that it holds. So purely out of curiosity, does any such demonstration exist?
 
  • Like
Likes vdvdlk
Physics news on Phys.org
Could you please give an example of a 'variable mass system'?
 
The stereotypical examples that come to mind are a rocket, or perhaps a moving traincar leaking water.
 
Well, you can set up an equation for the energy flux, obviously, where the rates of work (i.e power transferred) on the system combined with the rate by which energy leaves the system bymeans of energy carrying material will equal the rate of change of the kinetic energy in the system.
 
Thank you for this clarification. The work-energy theorem will apply to all the particles in the system, provided that you enlarge your system to include not just the particles in the rocket or the train car, but those that have left it (exhaust gases, leaked water). I suspect this is too general a remark to be of much use. I'll try and come up with something more specific, but let's hope someone else supplies what you want sooner than I will.
 
Last edited:
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top