Work Energy Theorem of a spring

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the application of the Work Energy Theorem to a spring system involving a disk. Participants question whether the change in potential energy is correctly calculated as Ufinal - Uinitial and discuss the implications of a positive result indicating a transfer of kinetic energy to potential energy. Confusion arises regarding the term "kg = 0.5m" and the relevance of the initial speed of the disk, with concerns that the disk lacks sufficient kinetic energy to complete two revolutions down the slope. The concept of radius of gyration is introduced to clarify the calculation of total kinetic energy, but inconsistencies in the problem's information lead to further skepticism about its validity. Overall, the discussion highlights the complexities and potential contradictions in interpreting the problem.
theBEAST
Messages
361
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


ZHW8r.png

The Attempt at a Solution


h2Yg4.jpg


Is this correct? Is the change in potential energy Ufinal-Uinitial?

My answer turns out to be a positive number, so intuitively does this mean that some of the kinetic energy went into potential and thus the final potential energy is greater than the initial?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks fine, but several things bother me.
What is "kg = 0.5m"?
Why are you told the initial speed of the disk?
Seems to me that the disk does not have enough KE to travel two revolutions down the slope, and it won't recoil that far either. But I cannot think of another interpretation of the question.
 
haruspex said:
Looks fine, but several things bother me.
What is "kg = 0.5m"?
Why are you told the initial speed of the disk?
Seems to me that the disk does not have enough KE to travel two revolutions down the slope, and it won't recoil that far either. But I cannot think of another interpretation of the question.

kg is the radius of gyration, it would be used to solve for the total KE which is the sum of the rotational and translational motion. This is given to throw the students off I think :P
 
theBEAST said:
kg is the radius of gyration, it would be used to solve for the total KE which is the sum of the rotational and translational motion. This is given to throw the students off I think :P
OK, but that doesn't satisfy my last point. As far as I can see, the information given is inconsistent. It would not travel two whole revolutions, in either direction. (Would somebody check that?) Superfluous information is one thing, contradictory information quite another.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top