Work & Momentum: T, F, r, sinθ

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the formula for torque, represented as T = F • r • sin(θ), and its units. Participants clarify that torque (T) is measured in Newton-meters (N•m), which is equivalent to the units of work, {(kg•m)/(s²)}•m. The relationship between torque and force is established, emphasizing that both are products of force and distance, leading to the same dimensional units. The confusion arises from the representation of torque in Newtons and the equivalency of units for torque and work.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of torque and its formula T = F • r • sin(θ)
  • Familiarity with unit conversions in physics, specifically Newtons and Newton-meters
  • Basic knowledge of rotational dynamics and angular displacement
  • Concept of dimensional analysis in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the relationship between torque and angular momentum
  • Learn about dimensional analysis in physics for unit equivalency
  • Explore the applications of torque in mechanical systems
  • Study the implications of torque in rotational motion and energy transfer
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of torque and its applications in rotational dynamics.

Anas
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello,
#1 As my teacher explained "T=F•r•sin<" all clear so far.
When i attempted to apply the formula it crossed my mind that the unit of T is (N•m), if so how do we solve for distence 0< r < 1.
#2 Another question if the unit is {(kg•m)/(s^2)}•m why did he represent moment with Newtons?
Assuming that he follows a rule of equivalency from tork to Newtons, how is it the same value on two different units?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anas said:
Hello,
#1 As my teacher explained "T=F•r•sin<" all clear so far.
When i attempted to apply the formula it crossed my mind that the unit of T is (N•m), if so how do we solve for distence 0< r < 1.
#2 Another question if the unit is {(kg•m)/(s^2)}•m why did he represent moment with Newtons?
Assuming that he follows a rule of equivalency from tork to Newtons, how is it the same value on two different units?
Hmm, you will need to tell us the context of this formula. As it stands, it could be to do with many different situations.
 
Anas said:
Assuming that he follows a rule of equivalency from tork to Newtons, how is it the same value on two different units?
It is difficult to understand what you are asking. My guess is that you are wondering why the unit for torque has the same dimensions as the unit for energy, both having dimensions of mass times distance squared over time squared.

One answer is that both are the product of a force times a distance. Another is that one Newton-meter of work is just what you would expect when applying one Newton-meter of torque over one radian of rotation. Since the radian is dimensionless, the units for torque and work will have the same dimensions.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 138 ·
5
Replies
138
Views
9K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 59 ·
2
Replies
59
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K