Work required to take object from planet to infinity

AI Thread Summary
The gravitational acceleration on the planet, similar in size to the Moon, is calculated to be 1.63 m/s². To determine the work required to lift a 100 kg creature from the planet's surface into space, it's essential to consider the gravitational force, which decreases with distance. The discussion highlights the ambiguity of the term "to infinity," suggesting that the goal is to move the creature beyond the significant effects of the gravitational field. Participants emphasize the importance of using gravitational potential energy equations for the calculation. The conversation underscores the need for clarity in defining the distance for which the work is calculated.
JesseJC
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A terrestrial creature with mass m = 100kg to is standing on a planet the same size as our moon

1.) what is the gravitational acceleration on the surface of this planet ? Ag = GM/R^2 = 1.63 m/s

2.) work required to take creature off of planets surface and into space ?

Homework Equations


R = 1.74x10^6
M = 7.36x10^22
m = 100kg

The Attempt at a Solution


I have no idea where to start, please help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not to infinity, it's enough to take him away where the gravitationnal field won't do so much, and i think (maybe) W = F.s will
F is just equal to gravitationnal force on the creature,
 
But one has to take into consideration that as the distance s is increasing, the force F is decreasing.
 
Alright, so I'm thinking that I'll need to multiply the gravitational force by a certain distance and that's it, I'm not working with integrals or anything in this course, but the question asks for me to calculate work needed to send the object to infinity, which is pretty ambiguous. It also says that it just needs to be out of the gravitational pull, like you said ^^^. I don't understand what distance I can apply.
 
If integration is not to be used, then one can use the idea of 'gravitational potential'.
 
Noctisdark said:
It's not to infinity

Oh, but it is. Jesse, you need an equation to represent the gravitational potential energy of the creature at the surface of the planet. That shouldn't be too difficult to find if you don't know it off the top of your head.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top