• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products Here!

Time of a falling object when the force of gravity isn't constant

  • #1
43
2

Homework Statement


Distance from planet = 10^14 meters, Radious of the planet = 10^7 meters, mass of the object = 100kg
g on the planet's surface = 10 m/s^2, g 10^14 meters away from the planets center = 2.5 m/s^2

Homework Equations


Fg=G*m*M/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution


I calculated the speed of the object at the surface of the planet ( 8931.5 m/s ) using Energy Conservation. I trןed to calculate the time using r(t), r(a) graphs.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
33,917
9,635
g 10^14 meters away from the planets center = 2.5 m/s^2
Are you sure this is at 1014 meters instead of the surface? That would make the "planet" a supermassive black hole.

I calculated the speed of the object at the surface of the planet ( 8931.5 m/s ) using Energy Conservation
Can you calculate the speed at other distances, too?
How much time does the object need to get 1 meter (or in general, dx) closer, as function of distance?
 
  • #3
43
2
Are you sure this is at 1014 meters instead of the surface? That would make the "planet" a supermassive black hole.
It's 10 m/s^2 at the surface and 2.5 m/s^2 10^7 meters from the surface or 10^14 meters from the center.
I've calculated the planet's mass is 1.5*10^25 kg so its density is 35,000 km/m^3, Whitch is close to the density of the sun's core.


Can you calculate the speed at other distances, too?
How much time does the object need to get 1 meter (or in general, dx) closer, as function of distance?
And I used Energy Conservation to find the velocity equation.
V = √2 * √G*M/r2-G*M/r1

I can't find any function of time.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,545
4,979
It's 10 m/s^2 at the surface and 2.5 m/s^2 10^7 meters from the surface or 10^14 meters from the center.
I've calculated the planet's mass is 1.5*10^25 kg so its density is 35,000 km/m^3, Whitch is close to the density of the sun's core.



And I used Energy Conservation to find the velocity equation.
V = √2 * √G*M/r2-G*M/r1

I can't find any function of time.
10^14 is a lot more than twice 10^7.
 
  • #5
43
2
10^14 is a lot more than twice 10^7.
Oh right its not 10^14 its 2*10^14.

But I checked my calculation and I used the
right numbers there. So it 2.5 m/s^2 10^7 meters away from the surface and 10 m/s^2 at the surface . (This is a quote from the book).

But the data isn't the main thing. I want to find the v(t) equation.
 
  • #6
33,917
9,635
Oh right its not 10^14 its 2*10^14.
Wait, what?
The density has another error of this type.

And I used Energy Conservation to find the velocity equation.
V = √2 * √G*M/r2-G*M/r1
Okay. v is the derivative of position with respect to time: v=dx/dt. What about 1/v? Can you see how to use that, especially if you combine it with the hint of post #2?
 
  • #7
43
2
Wait, what?
The density has another error of this type.


Okay. v is the derivative of position with respect to time: v=dx/dt. What about 1/v? Can you see how to use that, especially if you combine it with the hint of post #2?

Sorry its 10^7 and 2*10^7. I'm really tired.

I think I get what you say.
 
  • #8
SteamKing
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
12,798
1,666
It's 10 m/s^2 at the surface and 2.5 m/s^2 10^7 meters from the surface or 10^14 meters from the center.
I've calculated the planet's mass is 1.5*10^25 kg so its density is 35,000 km/m^3, Whitch is close to the density of the sun's core.

And I used Energy Conservation to find the velocity equation.
V = √2 * √G*M/r2-G*M/r1

I can't find any function of time.
Uhh, I'm not sure what kind of density 35,000 km/m3 is, but I'm pretty sure it's not the density at the sun's core. :rolleyes:

That number is about 150 g / cm3, or say 150,000 kg/m3.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

Pluto orbits at an average distance of 5.85×1012 m from the sun, which is still far short of 1014 m. :oops:
 
  • #9
43
2
Uhh, I'm not sure what kind of density 35,000 km/m3 is, but I'm pretty sure it's not the density at the sun's core. :rolleyes:

That number is about 150 g / cm3, or say 150,000 kg/m3.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sun

Pluto orbits at an average distance of 5.85×1012 m from the sun, which is still far short of 1014 m. :oops:
Yes, I know calculate all the data again with the correct numbers.
 
  • #10
43
2
OK, I calculated the planet's mass and the
object's velocity again. I got 1.5*10^25 kg for the planet's mass. And the velocity of the object is 10,000 m/s at the surface. I know 1414<t<2828 seconds.
I can't think of any equation that has time in it.
I did a(r) function and I found that the average acceleration is 5 m/s^2.
I used v(t) function for constant acceleration and I got 2,000 seconds. I'm not sure about that but I don't know anything about the time compared to something else.
 
  • #11
haruspex
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
32,545
4,979
OK, I calculated the planet's mass and the
object's velocity again. I got 1.5*10^25 kg for the planet's mass. And the velocity of the object is 10,000 m/s at the surface. I know 1414<t<2828 seconds.
I can't think of any equation that has time in it.
I did a(r) function and I found that the average acceleration is 5 m/s^2.
I used v(t) function for constant acceleration and I got 2,000 seconds. I'm not sure about that but I don't know anything about the time compared to something else.
To get the time, you will need to go back to the differential equation of motion and solve it.
 
  • #12
43
2
What about 1/v?
I'm not sure but:
t=1/X'(v)
So I have to find the derivative of x(v).

EDIT : I tried that and it failed.
 
Last edited:
  • #13
HallsofIvy
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
41,794
924
I presume you know that for gravity, [itex]F= -\frac{GmM}{r^2}[/itex]. Since F= ma, [itex]a= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/itex]. Integrate to get the speed at time t and integrate again to get the position.
 
  • #14
43
2
I presume you know that for gravity, [itex]F= -\frac{GmM}{r^2}[/itex]. Since F= ma, [itex]a= -\frac{GM}{r^2}[/itex]. Integrate to get the speed at time t and integrate again to get the position.
Well, I know newton law of gravtion but I don't know to integrate.
I tried every graph possible to get the v(t) but I can't find it.
I know the concept and basics of intgral calculus, but how I can get from the a(x) to the v(x)? In the last few hours I tried to do this with no secsuss.
I found v(x) and x(v).
 
  • #15
19,799
4,048
Have you learned about conservation of energy yet in your course?

Chet
 
  • #16
43
2
Have you learned about conservation of energy yet in your course?

Chet
Yes, and its just high school physics class.
 
  • #17
19,799
4,048
Yes, and its just high school physics class.
Do you know the equation for the potential energy of an object in a variable gravitational field (i.e., a gravitational field that varies with distance from a specified mass)?

Chet
 
  • #18
43
2
Do you know the equation for the potential energy of an object in a variable gravitational field (i.e., a gravitational field that varies with distance from a specified mass)?

Chet
Yes .
Pe=-G*M*m/r
 
  • #19
19,799
4,048
Yes .
Pe=-G*M*m/r
Excellent, except for a missing minus sign. So the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic energy of the falling body doesn't change as it falls. Let v = the velocity of the body at time t, and let r be the distance from the center of the planet at time t. What is the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic energy at time t? What is the sum at time zero? What is the velocity as a function of distance from the center?

Chet
 
  • #20
33,917
9,635
Didn't we have that formula in post #3 already?
 
  • #21
43
2
Didn't we have that formula in post #3 already?
Yes , V(x).
What is the sum of the potential energy and the kinetic energy at time t?

Chet
The sum doesn't change due to Energy conversation. And in t=0 we only have potential energy.
I can't find a function that contains time.
Its constantly changing so I can't simply multiply it with other variables, can't I?
I tried to use averages and triangle area but it didn't work.
 
  • #22
33,917
9,635
You'll need a differential equation. See my previous posts. Solving this differential equation is just an integral.
 
  • #23
43
2
You'll need a differential equation. See my previous posts. Solving this differential equation is just an integral.
I haven't learned yet how to solve a differential equation. I'm quite new to calculus.
But generally I need to take the derivative with respect to x . And this is the change in time,right ?
 
  • #24
33,917
9,635
Change in time as function of distance is a good approach.
 
  • #25
19,799
4,048
Are trying to find the velocity when the body hits or the amount of time it takes to fall?

Chet
 

Related Threads for: Time of a falling object when the force of gravity isn't constant

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
9
Views
450
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
620
  • Last Post
Replies
13
Views
1K
Top