Working out the velocity after a collision

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the final velocity after a head-on collision between two bodies, A and B, with masses of 4 kg and 3 kg, respectively. The initial velocities are 2 m/s for A and -5 m/s for B, indicating they move in opposite directions. Participants clarify that since the bodies stick together post-collision, the scenario is an inelastic collision, leading to the equation m1*u1 + m2*u2 = (m1 + m2)*v. After applying the correct signs for the velocities, the final calculation reveals that the combined velocity v is -1 m/s. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding momentum conservation and the direction of velocities in collision problems.
Matt.D
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, first time poster whose not sure if he's in the right forum, but here goes.

I have a question that reads:

A body, A, of mas 4kg moves with a velocity of 2ms-1 and collides head-on with another body, B, of mass 3kg moving in the opposite direction at 5 ms-1. After the collision the bodies move off together with the velocity v. Calculate v.

This is probably basic to most, but I've just returned to college. I'm not looking for the answers as such, but rather if someone could point me to the right equation. The ones I've tried using are:

m1 u1 + m2 v2 = m1 v1 + m2 v2

and

mv = mv1+mv2

and

mv1 = (M = m)v2 (I think this is wrong because its for an inelastic collision)

Thanks for reading!

Matt
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think that

m1v1 +m2v2=(m1+m2)V

should work since the balls stick together their mass combines and they have the same velocity.
 
What makes you think the collision is elastic?

--J
 
Hey guys, thanks for the quick replies!

Justin, until I re-read the question I didn't realize that it says 'the bodies move off together' so I guess it could be inelastic.

Thanks for the tip Arlamos. This is the solution I come up with.

m1• u1 + m2• u2 = m1• v1 + m2• v2
4 • 2 + 3 • 5 = 4 • 6 + 3 • v2
8 + 15 = 24 + 3v2
23 = 24 + 3v2
-23 -24
-1 = 3v2
v2 = - 1/3

I had a similar problem to this a few weeks ago and the way I worked it out looked similar. I'm going to college tomorrow (first day back) so I can check with my friends and I'll come back and tell you my findings. I can't hang stay online now, I'm in the UK and it's getting a bit late ;)

Thanks again for your feedback, it's been most useful!

Matt
 
Matt.D said:
m1• u1 + m2• u2 = m1• v1 + m2• v2
Realize that v1 = v2 = v. The collision is perfectly inelastic.
Better to write it as Arlamos suggested:
m1*u1 + m2*u2 = (m1 + m2)*v
4 • 2 + 3 • 5 = 4 • 6 + 3 • v2
Realize that the initial velocities are in opposite directions; so if one is positive, the other must be negative:
4*2 + 3*(-5) = (4 + 3)*v
 
Thanks for replying Doc Al. I had a discussion with one of my friends who pointed out that it needed to be negative. I've had a quick sketch on my pad and have come up with;

m1*u1 + m2*u2 = (m1+m2)*v
4*2 + 3*(-5) = (4+3)*v
8 + -15 = 7v
-7 = 7v
/7 /7

v = -1 ms-1
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top