Working with Bra and Ket vector notation

rwooduk
Messages
757
Reaction score
59
I have 2 ket vectors that i need to prove are orthogonal and normalised

I know <Up|Down> = <Down|Up> = 0 <---- Orthogonal Condition

I know <Up|Up> = <Down|Down> = 1 <---- Normalisation Condition

My problem is I have 2 ket vectors, say |A> and |B>, containing |Up> and |Down> terms.

How do I put the two ket vectors together? Do i simply put |A>|B> = And multiply the terms?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, you put <A|B> (for which you first need to find |B> from <B|). Then use the fact that the inner product <.|.> is bilinear to split everything up in the basis combinations you know equal 0 or 1.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thanks that helps alot!

edit how do you turn a ket into a bra? I've been through all my lecture notes, the workshop questions, the suggested book and there's nothing. she does this everytime! sets questions we haven't covered and i spent half the day trying to find something vaguely relevant on the internet. found this

"To turn a ket into a bra for purposes of taking inner products, write the complex conjugates of its components as a row."

how am i supposed to take the complex conjugate of a spin up vector?

i'll just write the full thing, please don't give a direct answer, i just need an example of the method or a youtube video of the method to use please

|A> = 1/SQRT2 (|UP>+|DOWN>)
 
Last edited:
OK, i tried it this way:

|A> = 1/SQRT2 |UP> + 1/SQRT2 |DOWN> = (1 0) <----- A 2X1 MATRIX i.e. stood upright

<A| = (<A|^T)* <---- THE TRANSPOSE OF THE COMPLEX CONJUGATE = (1 0)

THERFORE

<A|A> = (1 0)(1 0) = 1 <---- WHERE (1 0) IS A 2X1 MATRIX i.e. stood upright

Therefore normalised

<A|B> = (1 0)(0 1) = 0 <---- WHERE (0 1) IS A 2X1 MATRIX i.e. stood upright

Therefore orthogonal

that look right? don't know what happens to the 1/SQRT2 though??!?
 
Last edited:
when you take the complex conjugate of the Ket |A>, you take the conjugate of the 1/sqrt2 and flip the kets into bras. So |A>=(1/sqrt2)(|up>+|down>)
<A|=|A>*

<A|=(1/sqrt2)*(|up>+|down>)*=(1/sqrt2)*(<up|+<down|)=(1/sqrt2)(<up|+<down|)

where * denotes the complex conjugate, which doesn't affect real numbers
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top