World sheet EM tensor in complex coordinates

da_willem
Messages
594
Reaction score
1
In my Book (Becker, Becker, Schwarz) it is stated (eq 3.23) that the holomorphic component of the EM tensor is given by

T_X(z)=T_{zz}=-2 : \partial _z X \cdot \partial _z X :

Now why is the expression for the (holonorphic, zz, component of the) energy momentum tensor in complex coordinates?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
da_willem said:
In my Book (Becker, Becker, Schwarz) it is stated (eq 3.23) that the holomorphic component of the EM tensor is given by

T_X(z)=T_{zz}=-2 : \partial _z X \cdot \partial _z X :

Now why is the expression for the (holomorphic, zz, component of the) energy momentum tensor in complex coordinates?

I do not really understand the question, what is wrong with using complex coordinates?

nonplus
 
See e.g. E. Kiritsis, hep-th/9709062, page 44.
Essentially, you introduce new coordinates z=x+iy and \bar{z}=x-iy and then transform the components of the energy-momentum to new coordinates by the usual rules of tensor transformation.
If your question is why complex coordinates are introduced at the first place, the answer is because the requirement of 2-dimensional conformal invariance is particularly easy to achieve with complex coordinates. See e.g. (6.1.6) and (6.1.7) in the reference above.
 
Last edited:
Hmm, they were so short about it in the book that I think they presumed the relation should be intuitively clear or common knowledge or something. Well, I tried the transformation to complex coordinates:

T(z)= T_{zz} = (\frac{\partial x^0}{\partial z})^2T_{00} + (\frac{\partial x^1}{\partial z})^2T_{11}

As the off-diagonal elements are zero. Now using x^0=\frac{1}{2}(z+/bar{z})[/tex] and x^1=\frac{i}{2}(z-/bar{z})[/tex] we get that <br /> <br /> T(z)=\frac{1}{4}(T_{00} -T_{11}<br /> <br /> which is zero, as the terms are equal. This is the correct result, the ws em tensor should vanish, but leaves me blank as to how they got that expression...
 
da_willem said:
This is the correct result, the ws em tensor should vanish, but leaves me blank as to how they got that expression...
The same way you did. :smile:
 
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
Back
Top