Wormholes, parallel universes, negative mass

In summary, it appears that the possibility of building a wormhole to a parallel or baby universe is theoretically possible, but there are many obstacles that must be overcome before this could be accomplished. Further research is needed to determine if such a wormhole could be opened and maintained.
  • #1
hammertime
135
0
Hi. I have a few questions.

Is it theoretically possible to build a wormhole to a parallel or baby universe? Could a sufficiently advanced civilization do this? Could negative mass play a role in it? Could something else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think if we can answer these questions, we would know a lot more about our universe. As far as I know, there are some calculations which show that the existence of a wormhole to a parallel is indeed possible (Hawking,...).

However, it's not that easy... I assume that we must use a enormous amount of energy to create such a wormhole. Therefore, the physics in this environment will be a lot more complex than it is here on earth.
 
  • #3
Nobody knows what happens in the singularity of a black hole.
 
  • #4
hammertime said:
Hi. I have a few questions.

Is it theoretically possible to build a wormhole to a parallel or baby universe? Could a sufficiently advanced civilization do this? Could negative mass play a role in it? Could something else?

We do know that it would require a time machine to build a wormhole classically. There's a quote about this from Thorne that I can probably dig up if pressed, it's in his semi-popular book Black Holes, Wormholes & Time Machines, which also has a reference to the peer-reviewed paper that derives this result. I don't know if "baby universes" were even considered in this paper (probably not).

Thus most papers on wormholes (that I'm aware of, anyway), focus on finding a "quantum wormhole" and keeping it open, rather than building one.

If you want to look at the professional literature on wormholes, you might start with the Moriss-Thorne paper,

http://scitation.aip.org/getabs/servlet/GetabsServlet?prog=normal&id=AJPIAS000056000005000395000001&idtype=cvips&gifs=yes

though you'll most likely need to go to a library to get access to it.

If you are interested in semi-popular works, I would recommend Cramer's "Alternate Views" columns, which are available online, see for instance

http://www.npl.washington.edu/av/#6

We also know that it will take exotic matter (what you probably mean by negative mass) to hold open a wormhole throat.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #5
Different constants

But wouldn't a parallel and/or a baby universe have different physical constants and vacuum energy from our universe? Thus, wouldn't we be destroyed once we entered the other universe?
 
  • #6
hammertime said:
But wouldn't a parallel and/or a baby universe have different physical constants and vacuum energy from our universe? Thus, wouldn't we be destroyed once we entered the other universe?

It's not particularly clear how to translate "baby universe" into an exact mathematical form where the question might be answered.

There are other issues relating to what "different physical constants" might mean, for that matter. If we take a specific example, "What happens if we open a wormhole with two different values of the fine structure constant on each end", this is not a topic which GR could address as it is not a complete theory of quantum gravity. I don't think current quantum gravity is advanced enough to answer this question, either, but I don't know that area very well.

The topic of 'different physical constants" comes up a lot, for an interesting but rather long paper on it see

http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/1126-6708/2002/03/023/jhep032002023.pdf?request-id=4DKqigmP3BGYZK_A2wi7Kg

I'll quote one view that I have some sympathy with, note that the three authors of the above paper each have differing views:

The idea of imagining a universe with different constants is not new, but, in my opinion,
the early literature is very confusing. For example, Vol'berg [17] and Gamow [18] imagine a universe in which the velocity of light is different from ours, say by ten orders of magnitude, and describe all sorts of weird effects hat would result:

Gamow said:
The initials of Mr. Tompkins originated from three fundamental physical constants: the velocity of light c; the gravitational constant G; and the quantum constant h, which have to be changed by immensely large factors in order to make their effect easily noticeable by the man on the street."

In this one sentence, Gamow manages to encapsulate everything I am objecting to!
First, he takes it as axiomatic that there are three fundamental constants. Second, he
assumes a change in these constants can be operationally defined, I for one am mystified
by such comparisons. After all, an inhabitant of such a universe (let us identify him with
Feynman's alien) is perfectly free to choose units in which c = 1, just as we are. To use
the equation

k = E/c

to argue that in his universe, for the same energy E, the photon emitted by an atom would have a momentum k that is ten orders of magnitude smaller than ours is, to my mind, meaningless. There is no experimental information that we and the alien could exchange that would allow us to draw any conclusion.
 

Related to Wormholes, parallel universes, negative mass

1. What are wormholes and how do they work?

Wormholes are hypothetical tunnels or shortcuts through space-time that connect two distant points in the universe. They are predicted by Einstein's theory of general relativity and are thought to be created by the warping of space-time caused by massive objects such as black holes. To travel through a wormhole, one would need to travel at speeds faster than the speed of light, which is currently not possible according to our current understanding of physics.

2. Can wormholes be used for time travel?

While the theory of general relativity allows for the existence of wormholes, it also suggests that time travel is not possible. This is because time travel would require traveling faster than the speed of light, which is not possible according to the theory. Additionally, the energy and matter required to keep a wormhole open for time travel would be immense and currently beyond our technological capabilities.

3. How are parallel universes related to wormholes?

Parallel universes, also known as alternate or parallel realities, are hypothetical universes that exist alongside our own. Some theories suggest that wormholes could connect us to these parallel universes, allowing for travel between them. However, this is purely speculative and there is no scientific evidence to support the existence of parallel universes or their connection to wormholes.

4. What is negative mass and how does it relate to wormholes?

Negative mass is a theoretical concept in physics where an object would have a mass with a negative value. It is not to be confused with antimatter, which has positive mass but opposite charge. Theoretically, negative mass would cause a repulsive gravitational force, which some scientists suggest could be used to stabilize wormholes and prevent them from collapsing. However, the existence of negative mass has not been proven and remains a topic of debate in the scientific community.

5. Can wormholes be created artificially?

While wormholes are predicted by the laws of physics, they have not been observed or created in nature. Some scientists have proposed the idea of creating wormholes artificially, but this remains purely theoretical at this point. The amount of energy and knowledge required to create and stabilize a wormhole is currently beyond our capabilities, making it unlikely that we will be able to create them in the near future.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
994
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top