Worth taking higher level physics classes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter djfermion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Classes Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a college sophomore majoring in physics who is considering whether to continue with higher-level physics courses despite intending to go to medical school. The individual expresses concerns about the potential difficulty and competitiveness of 4000-level physics classes, questioning their value for intellectual curiosity given the risk of lowering their GPA. Responses highlight that upper-level physics courses often involve tedious math and may not align with the individual's interests, suggesting that a biology major could be a more suitable alternative. The consensus indicates that while physics can deepen understanding of the world, it may require a level of mathematical rigor that the individual does not wish to pursue. Overall, the recommendation leans towards switching to a biology degree, which would allow for a broader exploration of interests without the same level of technical commitment.
djfermion
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I am a sophomore in college right now intending to major in physics. The thing though is that I am fairly certain that I want to go to medical school and thus am just pursuing the major for my own intellectual curiosity. I am taking junior level mechanics and electrodynamics courses this year and then will probably take quantum mechanics my junior year. These courses are all classified as 3000 level courses and to get my major I also have to complete several 4000 level courses.

Now my question is, is it really worth taking these higher level 4000 level courses (statistical mechanics, thermodynamics, solid state physics, etc.) for intellectual curiosity purposes. This may seem like a weird question, but I have heard that many upper level classes are more about solving complicated tedious math problems. Also another concern is that they could possibly lower my gpa. In your experience are higher level classes extremely difficult and competitive or do most people at that level feel comfortable with the material and do fairly well?

I have done a decent amount of undergrad physics research, and while I find it very interesting and will continue to do it while in college, I cannot make a career out of it. That being said which classes beyond 3000 level quantum mechanics do you suggest I take merely for intellectual curiosity sake that won't be too detrimental to my gpa.

Thanks for your help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your concerns about upper division physics classes are all well-founded, tedious math problems, difficult and competitive classes, and lower GPAs all do occur.

The main variables are your level of preperation and the difficulty of your university. If you are not very well prepared, or if your university is top notch, then you may want to avoid the upper division physics classes. What is your alternative to finishing the physics major? If you do stay in physics, keep in mind that you may find areas of research that excite you more then what you have done as an undergrad.
 
I guess the alternative to completing my physics major would be to complete a biology major, which is not too difficult (4 additional classes), and then just take whatever physics/math classes interest me.

Right now I am going into physics because I like understanding with more detail how the world around me works. Also, I like the challenge of solving a problem using intuition. But at the same time, I do not really have any passion to delve extremely deep into the technical aspects of math and physics, especially not to the point of earning a phd. I'm not sure if this makes sense, but that is my current thought process and with that are there any upper level classes that you feel would interest me?
 
I really think you would prefer the biology degree, based on everything you have said. Generally, physical intuition becomes less a part of physics coursework, and the mathematical intuition that you (rightfully) consider to belong to the technical aspects of mathematics becomes supremely important. Also, without going to graduate school in physics all of that difficult math and physics homework would seem to go nowhere, the standard undergrad curriculum leaves everyone with unfinished knowledge unless they read extra books for fun on the side.

Let me know if you want me to talk you into it more, but I really strongly recommend you do the biology degree.
 
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...
Hello, I’m an undergraduate student pursuing degrees in both computer science and physics. I was wondering if anyone here has graduated with these degrees and applied to a physics graduate program. I’m curious about how graduate programs evaluated your applications. In addition, if I’m interested in doing research in quantum fields related to materials or computational physics, what kinds of undergraduate research experiences would be most valuable?

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
452
Replies
102
Views
5K
Back
Top