Would an idea be a particle or a wave or both?

Sksisme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
If an Atom doesn't decide if it will be a particle or a wave until it is measured, and we assume thought is the tool for measurement...In quantum physics would an idea be a particle or a wave or both?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
More likely a wave. Hopefully a brain wave.
 
  • Like
Likes CalcNerd and tom aaron
If thought could be used as the tool for measurement, and the measurement is the trigger for an atom to make decisions could we control the decision outcome? But as I understand it the "observer" is the influence that makes the atom decide to be a particle. If that is true would thought be considered an observer and therefore can only lead to a particle outcome or can thought be considered non-visual. If it is non-visual does that mean it would have no impact on the outcome?
 
Sksisme said:
... and we assume thought is the tool for measurement.
That would be a bad assumption. It is observation/detection that triggers the collapse.
 
Sksisme said:
If an Atom doesn't decide if it will be a particle or a wave until it is measured

This is a common pop science statement, but it's a serious oversimplification. "Measurement" is simply an interaction that can change the state of the atom. Some states have useful particle interpretations, some don't; some states have useful wave interpretations, some don't. And in any case, "particle" and "wave" are not intrinsic physical attributes of an atom or its states; they are labels that we humans put on certain states to help us try to understand what's going on. If we choose to change the label we use because the atom underwent some interaction and changed its state, that's our choice as humans trying to analyze the experiment; the atom didn't "decide" anything, we did.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Sksisme said:
If an Atom doesn't decide if it will be a particle or a wave until it is measured, and we assume thought is the tool for measurement...

As a starting assumption, this is a near-hopeless oversimplification of a fairly subtle issue. There are many threads here discussing the role of conscious thought and the notions of wave/particle duality and particles "choosing" to be one or the other, and I suggest that you work your way through some of them so that you can start on more solid ground.

This thread is closed.
 
  • Like
Likes bhobba
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top