Would anything change electric charges could be complex numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the theoretical possibility of electric charges being represented as complex numbers rather than strictly positive or negative values. It draws an analogy with the Argand diagram, suggesting that just as complex numbers encompass a range of values, electric charges could potentially exist in a spectrum. However, current quantum electrodynamics (QED) only accommodates real charges, necessitating a complete reworking of existing theories to include complex charges. The conversation raises questions about why electric charges are limited to positive and negative and whether exploring this concept could address unresolved issues in physics. Ultimately, the inquiry reflects a desire to deepen understanding of the fundamental nature of electric charge.
Nick Kelly
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider an Argand diagram that shows the number line (positive and negative) and the imaginary plane of other possibilities.

As in, we have numbers that are positive and negative, and through complex numbers all of the polarities in between.

I am using this as an analogy, because we have experimentally observed particles and antiparticles; mass with positive and negative charges.

Can anybody point me in the direction of work that has theorized the possibility of electrical charges that are neither positive nor negative, but rather values in-between?

Either that or perhaps explain why it isn't possible?

Conceptually this seems to be a perfect fit with Klein's notion of dimensions wrapped up within our three dimensions.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Electric charge is either positive or negative. That's the way it is.
 


mathman said:
Electric charge is either positive or negative. That's the way it is.

Thank you, but is it valid to ask why it's just the way it is?

I mean, obviously there is no point inventing possibilities for the sake of it; and I know that we have only ever observed positive or negative charges.

My question is really: if you take on the theoretical possibility of charges that are neither positive nor negative; then isn't it useful for changing the equations of QED to account for some of the features that are still problematic?

I am still trying to get my head around the physics, which is why I wanted to post to the forum to see if anybody could help out with this thinking, but I suspect that I need to make the ideas a lot clearer before that point.
 
QED does not permit complex charges, only real ones. You would need to develop an entirely different theory with different equations.
 
Thank you, I shall begin taking the requisite steps to address the deep chasms of my naivete so that I can take this on as a serious problem.
 
Thread 'Inducing EMF Through a Coil: Understanding Flux'
Thank you for reading my post. I can understand why a change in magnetic flux through a conducting surface would induce an emf, but how does this work when inducing an emf through a coil? How does the flux through the empty space between the wires have an effect on the electrons in the wire itself? In the image below is a coil with a magnetic field going through the space between the wires but not necessarily through the wires themselves. Thank you.
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (Second part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8. I want to understand some issues more correctly. It's a little bit difficult to understand now. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. In the page 196, in the first paragraph, the author argues as follows ...
Back
Top