Write an expression for the Optical path length

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving expressions for the Optical Path Length (OPL) of rays passing through a converging lens with specific parameters. For part (a), the user correctly applies the Pythagorean theorem to find the OPL for the ray at the edge of the lens. In part (b), the user formulates the OPL for the ray through the center but miscalculates when squaring both sides of the equation in part (c). A participant points out that the user needs to remember that the square of a sum is not simply the sum of squares, which is crucial for solving the equation accurately. The conversation highlights the importance of careful mathematical manipulation in optical calculations.
goodo
Hi,

I'm hoping I can get some help. (I'm a first time poster, so if there's something that isn't quite clear, please let me know).

A converging lens (n=1.355) in air has diameter 4.0cm, thickness 0.50cm and zero thickness at its edges.

A point object at 'So' = 18cm has an image at 'Si'= x cm. (where 'So' and 'Si' are distances from the center of the lens)

(a) Write an expression for the Optical path length (OPL) of the ray passing through the edge of the lens and (b) an expression for the OPL of the ray passing through the centre of the lens, and (c) determine the distance x.

(sqrt= square root, sq = squared) For (a) I used pythagorus. OPL = sqrt(18 sq + 2 sq) + sqrt(x sq + 2 sq)

(b) OPL = 17.75 +(x-0.25) + 0.5n
=17.5+x+.6775
=18.1775+x
=18.18+x

(c) Now I have both in term of x. Since OPL1=OPL2,
sqrt(18 sq + 2 sq) + sqrt(x sq + 2 sq)=18.18+x
(square both sides) 18 sq + 4 + x sq + 4 = 18.18 sq + x sq
332 + x sq = 330.5 + x sq

I can't think of any other way to do it, yet something must be wrong as I have to calculate x. Is there a reason why I'm 1.5 off other than rounding? Wouldn't the x sq both cancel out leaving me with nothing?

Thanks
goodo
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome goodo,
I think everything's OK up to here:
sqrt(18 sq + 2 sq) + sqrt(x sq + 2 sq)=18.18+x
(square both sides) 18 sq + 4 + x sq + 4 = 18.18 sq + x sq
The square of a sum is not the sum of squares.
Remember: (a + b)2 = a2 + 2ab + b2.

BTW, the 1st root has no x, so you can calculate its value. Makes things easier...
 
Last edited:
Thansk for your response arcnets.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top