Writing the Magnetic Induction Eq. for a Rotating Magnetic Field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the formulation of the magnetic induction equation in the context of a rotating magnetic field, particularly for a rotating star with a magnetic field anchored to its surface. The equation is expressed as d_t B = nabla x (v x B - eta nabla x B), where d_t represents the time derivative, B is the magnetic field, v is the plasma velocity field, and eta denotes total diffusivity. The user seeks to understand the additional terms that arise when transitioning to a non-inertial reference frame due to the rotation of the star. The conversation also highlights the relevance of Maxwell's equations and Ohm's law in deriving the induction equation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of magnetic induction equations
  • Familiarity with Maxwell's equations
  • Knowledge of non-inertial reference frames
  • Basic concepts of plasma physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of Maxwell's equations in non-inertial frames
  • Study the implications of rotating magnetic fields on plasma dynamics
  • Explore the effects of diffusivity in magnetic induction equations
  • Examine advanced texts on plasma physics and magnetohydrodynamics
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, astrophysicists, and researchers working on magnetohydrodynamics, particularly those interested in the behavior of magnetic fields in rotating systems and their interactions with plasma.

Sky Walker
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everybody, I have a question about the magnetic induction equation. I am interested in the non ideal case, i.e. when there is a non negligible diffusivity, however as regards my question I think that this is not relevant.

I first ask the question and then give additional explanations:
How do I write the magnetic induction equation when the magnetic field is rotating (of if you prefer, when the reference system where the magnetic field is at rest is not a non inertial one)?

In particular, I am interested in the case of a rotating star, which is endowed with some magnetic field. The field is anchored to the surface of the star and corotates with it. Then I want to use the indcution equation to describe the interaction between the stellar magnetic field and some plasma which is orbiting around the central object.

Now, in general the magnetic induction equation is written as:

d_t B = nabla x ( v x B - eta nabla x B )

where:
d_t = partial derivative with respect to time
B = magnetic field
v = velocity field of the plasma
eta = total diffusivity
x = cross product and
nabla = del operator

The problem is that "in general" the electromagnetic field are not considered to be moving by themselves. "Not so bad, why don't you just go in a reference where the electromagnetic is at rest?" Yes I can do that, but the point is that this reference would be non inertial (it is rotating), therefore I would expect to find some additional terms in the equation. Otherwise I think that the only difference would be that of changing the velocity of the plasma v, with the relative velocity between the plasma and the magnetic field.

Can someone help me in finding which are these additional terms?
It might be useful to shift the problem to Maxwell's equations and Ohm's law, since the induction equation is derived from them (in the approximation of non-relativistic motion and neglecting the displacement current).

I apologise if posting in the wrong forum section.
Thanks for any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Thank you for your advice, that was useful, but I am still struggling.

Can anybody give me a reference about Maxwell's equations in non-inertial frames? This should be quite a known issue, however I have not find any book or review where it is properly treated/addressed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
899
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K