Mo Anode X-ray Filtering in Mammography: Why is Mo Ideal?

  • Thread starter Thread starter BobP
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam X-ray
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

In mammography, the use of a molybdenum (Mo) anode is essential due to its ability to produce characteristic X-rays at energies between 17-20 keV. The Mo filter is also deemed ideal because it selectively absorbs certain X-ray energies while allowing others to pass through, particularly when thin enough to prevent complete absorption. The mechanisms involved in X-ray production include core-level excitation (K-edge excitation) and the bremsstrahlung process, with the latter having a lower probability of absorption compared to K-edge X-rays. This selective absorption is crucial for optimizing image quality in mammographic imaging.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of X-ray production mechanisms, specifically K-edge excitation and bremsstrahlung.
  • Knowledge of molybdenum (Mo) properties and its application in medical imaging.
  • Familiarity with X-ray energy ranges, particularly in the context of mammography.
  • Basic principles of filtering in radiographic techniques.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of molybdenum in medical imaging applications.
  • Learn about K-edge absorption and its significance in X-ray filtering.
  • Explore the effects of filter thickness on X-ray transmission and absorption.
  • Investigate advancements in mammography technology and alternative anode materials.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for medical physicists, radiologists, and engineers involved in mammography technology, as well as researchers focused on improving imaging techniques and filter design.

BobP
Messages
70
Reaction score
1
In mammography, an Mo anode is used because it produces characteristic X-rays at about 17-20 keV.

Apparently, the ideal filter is also Mo. Why is this? Surely all the x-rays would just be re-absorbed by the filter?
Thank you
 
Science news on Phys.org
BobP said:
In mammography, an Mo anode is used because it produces characteristic X-rays at about 17-20 keV.

Apparently, the ideal filter is also Mo. Why is this? Surely all the x-rays would just be re-absorbed by the filter?
Thank you

How thick is the filter?

Typically, the mechanism for x-ray production in such devices is via two different processes: core-level excitation (i.e. K-edge excitation) and bremsstrahlung process. So already, via the latter, the energy may not match the Mo states. But even via the former, if the Mo filter is thin enough, the absorption isn't 100%.
https://www.google.com/search?q=bre...3Z_MAhWHgYMKHQq2CC0QvwUIGigA&biw=1280&bih=579
Zz.
 
ZapperZ said:
How thick is the filter?

Typically, the mechanism for x-ray production in such devices is via two different processes: core-level excitation (i.e. K-edge excitation) and bremsstrahlung process. So already, via the latter, the energy may not match the Mo states. But even via the former, if the Mo filter is thin enough, the absorption isn't 100%.
Zz.
Well exactly. if we consider the brehmsstrahlung radiation, the probability of absorption is less than k-edge x-rays so they should be absorbed less? no? hence the k-edge x-rays are absorbed MORE than the other radiation?
 
BobP said:
Well exactly. if we consider the brehmsstrahlung radiation, the probability of absorption is less than k-edge x-rays so they should be absorbed less? no? hence the k-edge x-rays are absorbed MORE than the other radiation?

That will be my guess, but again, I don't know the setup and the nature of this "filter".

Zz.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
10K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K