(x1, ct1) = (25m, 25m) - What do the 'm' represent? (SR)

  • Thread starter Thread starter seasponges
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sr
AI Thread Summary
In the context of special relativity, the notation (x1, ct1) represents spatial and temporal coordinates, where 'm' stands for meters. The 'ct' term indicates that time is being multiplied by the speed of light, resulting in a length measurement in meters. This can lead to confusion if not properly understood, as students might misinterpret the time coordinate as a regular spatial coordinate. Clarifying that both spatial and temporal components are expressed in meters helps prevent misunderstandings. Understanding this notation is crucial for accurately interpreting Minkowski coordinates in relativity.
seasponges
Messages
16
Reaction score
1
I'm currently completing a special relativity assignment, and whenever coordinates are referred to they're represented as (x1, ct1) = (25m, 25m) or (6m, 2m). There are no units given (other than the 'm', and I highly doubt they're using minutes for ct). If someone could clear this up for me I'd be very grateful.

Cheers!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
"m" as in Minkowski coordinates, perhaps?

ct has dimensions of length, btw.

Note that unless you work with the full 4-vector, it would be extremely easy for students to misunderstand the notation without the "m", falsely believing the time coordinate was a regular space coordinate.
 
Last edited:
M for meter perhaps, since these have the dimension of length.
 
Just to clarify, it is for "meters."

Spatial units are typically denoted in m, and I'm sure you've seen x represent a spatial coordinate.

ct is also meters, because c is the speed of light and c=3*108 meters/second [m/s] except it is multiplied by time. So you have a velocity (c) times time.
(meters/seconds)*seconds=meters because the seconds cancel.
 
Ha, it didn't occur to me ct was in meters (very new to SR). Thanks!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top