Xenon Poisoning: Decay & First Order Diff. Eqns

  • Thread starter Thread starter morbidwork
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    poison Xenon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of xenon poisoning in nuclear reactors, particularly focusing on the decay of xenon and iodine and their relationship to first-order differential equations. Participants explore the dynamics of fission products and their concentrations in the context of reactor operation and shutdown.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant inquires about the concentration of xenon when a reactor cannot be restarted without waiting for decay, linking this to first-order differential equations governing iodine and xenon decay.
  • Another participant provides details on fission products, noting the decay chain from tellurium to iodine to xenon, and emphasizes the importance of equilibrium concentrations during reactor operation.
  • A participant presents two differential equations for iodine and xenon, assuming these are the only reactions occurring, and seeks to determine when xenon concentration becomes too high for reactor restart.
  • There is a question regarding the assumptions of a homogeneous reactor and one-group diffusion theory in the context of the discussion.
  • One participant claims to have found a solution, estimating that xenon concentration must be 2.5 times greater than its equilibrium level for the reactor to be unable to restart, suggesting a rough time frame for reactor restart.
  • Another participant challenges the previous assumption, stating that the ability to restart the reactor depends on the worth of the xenon load and the adjuster rods, indicating that the transient behavior of xenon is influenced by the amount of iodine present prior to reactor shutdown.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the assumptions regarding xenon concentration and reactor restart conditions, indicating that multiple competing perspectives exist without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific decay rates and the dynamics of fission products, but there are unresolved assumptions regarding reactor behavior and the mathematical modeling of xenon and iodine concentrations.

morbidwork
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
whats the concentration when the reactor is not able to be turned back on without waiting for the xenon to decay and how does this relate to the first order differential equations of the decay of iodine and xenon.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is one looking for a qualitative or quantitative answer?

Fission products include Te, I and Xe directly, and then Te decays to I which decacy to Xe, and Xe decays to Cs. Xe-135 has a very high absorption cross-section for thermal neutrons. Half-life of I-135 is 6.58 hrs and the half-life of Xe-135 is 9.14 hrs.

When power reactor or any reactor is operating at steady-state, fission products are present in equilibrium concentrations, i.e. the production rate from fission and decay equals the loss due to decay or neutron absorption.

When a power reactor reduces power, the loss of Xe-135 decreases and so it's concentration increases to a greater level before decaying to a new equilibrium concentration.

Can one find an equation for the Xe concentration in ones text. There should be a source (production) term and decay term. The source term would include a term from fission and one from the decay of I-135.
 
Im given two equations one for I and Xe and assume that those are the only chain reactions at the time:

dt(I) + lambda_i*I = 0
dt(Xe) - lambda_i*I + lambda_xe*Xe=0

then I have initial Xe and I concentrations and the lambdas refer to the half life of Xe and I.
If the reacter is turned off right away and no new xenon or I are formed at what point does the concentration of xenon reach too high for the reacter to restart without having to wait for the Xe to break down.
 
Does one also assume homogeneous reactor with one-group diffusion theory?
 
Nevermind, found a acceptable solution.

Assumed that when xenon concentration was 2.5 times greater then it was then during equilibrium, because 2-3 neutrons are "made" every fission reaction that the reactor would not be able to be restarted which gave a rough estimate of half an hour for a reactor to be able to be turned back on before xenon poisonout.
 
morbidwork, your assumption right above here is super wrong, but the time is about right.

depends on the mk worth of the Xe poison load and the worth of the adjuster rods in-core. If your adjuster rods in core absorb 5 mk reactivity, when removed will add 5 mk positive. So to turn the Xe curve around, you would need to pull Adjusters to get back to critical before the Xe built up to above their worth.

The Xe transient peak value and rate is determined by the amount of I-135 in core prior to trip, which is proportional to the reactor power pre trip.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
11K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K