Yes, that is a valid example."Illustrating A in B and B in C not Implies A in C

  • Thread starter Thread starter mattmns
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion clarifies that the relationship A in B and B in C does not imply A in C through a specific example. In this case, A is defined as {1}, B as {2, {1}}, and C as {5, {2, {1}}}. The example demonstrates that while A is an element of B and B is an element of C, A is not an element of C. Participants acknowledge the validity of the example and suggest exploring additional rules or examples to illustrate the concept further. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding these relationships in set theory.
mattmns
Messages
1,121
Reaction score
5
Give an example to show that A\in B and B \in C does not imply that A \in C

Maybe I am misunderstanding the problem, but it seems as though there may be an infinite amount of solutions. For example: A = {1}, B = {2, {1}}, C = {5, {2, {1}}}

Is that correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, they only wanted AN example.

You could try giving two of `em, or maybe a "rule".
How many different KINDS of rules can you come up with?
 


Yes, that is a valid example. In this case, A = {1} is an element of B = {2, {1}}, and B is an element of C = {5, {2, {1}}}, but A is not an element of C. This shows that A \in B and B \in C does not necessarily imply that A \in C.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top