Yes, this is correct. At time t = 4, the two particles' directions are parallel.

AI Thread Summary
At time t = 4, the directions of two particles, represented by the vectors (t-6,-t,6) and (1,2,1-t), are confirmed to be parallel. The relationship for parallel vectors, a = Kb, was applied, leading to the equations t-6 = k, -t = 2k, and 6 = k(1-t). Solving these equations yielded t = 4, which was verified by substituting back into the original vectors. The calculations confirmed that one vector is indeed a scalar multiple of the other at this time. The conclusion is that the solution is correct, demonstrating the method's effectiveness.
vorcil
Messages
395
Reaction score
0
Two particles move through space in a way that at time t, they are traveling in directions

(t-6,-t,6) And (1,2,1-t)
at what time are their directions parallel?

-

I know that for them to be parallel, a = Kb, where a and b are the two vectors, and one vector is a scalar of the other

I get something along the lines of

(t-6,-t,6) = K(1,2,1-t)
giving me equations
t-6 = k
-t = 2k
6 = k(1-t)

please someone check

I had -t = 2k
(-t/2) = k

subbing into t-6

t-6 = (-t/2)
2(t-6) = -t
2t - 12 = -t
3t = 12
12/3 = t
t=4

is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is easy to check. Substitute t = 4 into your two vectors. If this value of t is correct, one vector will be a scalar multiple of the other (and vice versa, but the scalar multiple in this case will be the reciprocal of the other).
 
Mark44 said:
This is easy to check. Substitute t = 4 into your two vectors. If this value of t is correct, one vector will be a scalar multiple of the other (and vice versa, but the scalar multiple in this case will be the reciprocal of the other).

so it's right?
 
What does your check show?
 
(-2,-4,6)=k(1,2,-3)

-2=k*1, k = -2
-4=k*2 k = -4/2 = -2
6=k*(-3) k = 6/(-3) = -2

so yeah

awesome sauce
cheers bigears
 
Good work! And you did it all yourself!
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top