Proving the Existence of One Positive Integer m and n for x in Real Numbers

  • Thread starter Thread starter YourLooks
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the existence of unique positive integers m and n for any real number x, where m satisfies m ≤ x < m + 1 and n satisfies n < x ≤ n + 1. Participants suggest defining two sets, X and Y, where X contains integers less than x and Y contains integers less than or equal to x. The supremum of these sets, m and n respectively, is proposed as the solution to demonstrate the required properties. The conversation emphasizes the importance of proving that m belongs to set X and n belongs to set Y. This approach provides a structured method to establish the existence of the integers in question.
YourLooks
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
x is a real number, could you tell me how to prove that there will always be one and only one positive integer m such that m=< x <m+1 and one and only one positive integer n such that n< x =< n+1 ?
Thank you...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like homework, read the rules on homework above (we'll help you, but we won't do it for you).
 
Oh, Poet jcsd, I didn't know that.
But how will Poet help me ?
 
YourLooks said:
x is a real number, could you tell me how to prove that there will always be one and only one positive integer m such that m=< x <m+1 and one and only one positive integer n such that n< x =< n+1 ?
Thank you...
Suppose there are 2 sets X and Y, X={k belongs to Z : k<x}, Y={k belongs to Z : k<=x}, which means X and Y are not set zero and there should be a sup. Now you only need to let m=supX and n=supY then try to prove m belongs to X and n belongs to Y. Thats all.
 
Thank you for helping Yourlooks, you are really new to this forum :wink:
 
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top