Young's Inequality alternative proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter grabthat123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
grabthat123
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Young's Inequality can be restated as:

s^(x)t^(1-x)<=xs + (1-x)t where s,t>=0 and 0<x<1.

Basically I've been asked to prove this. I've been fiddling about with it for a couple of hours
to no avail.

I've tried to substitute t=e^u and s=e^v and then use partial differentiation w.r.t to v on st, but I'm not getting the required form. (I can't assume that exp is a convex function - otherwise it follows trivially)

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know how to prove it yet, but my 2 cents would be:
(\frac{s}{t})^x t \leq sx + (1-x)t
(\frac{s}{t})^x \leq \frac{s}{t} x + 1-x
a^x \leq a x + 1 - x
for a &gt; 0
This way, you have one variable less to worry about
 
Actually, think about it, consider the function
f(x)=ax + 1 - x - a^x
f(0)=1-1=0
f(1) = a + 1 - 1 - a = 0
f&#039;(x_0)= a - 1 - \ln a a^{x_0} = 0
a^{x_0} = \frac{a - 1}{\ln a}
Now assume a&gt;1. Then if you can show that the rhs is smaller than a, you have shown that 0 &lt; x_0 &lt; 1. so
a-1 &lt; \ln a a
1 - \frac{1}{a} &lt; \ln a
I think you can find this property somewhere.
f&#039;&#039;(x)=- (\ln a) ^2 a^{x} which is smaller than 0 everywhere, particularly at x_0.
So for a > 1 you have already proven everything. For a < 1, you have to show that the rhs is larger than a. Let a = 1/b with b &gt; 1.
\frac{\frac{1}{b}-1}{\ln \frac{1}{b}} &gt; \frac{1}{b}
\frac{\frac{1}{b}-1}{-\ln b} &gt; \frac{1}{b}
1 - b &lt; \ln b
since b > 1, this should hold trivially.
Anyhow, it all comes down to 1 - \frac{1}{a} &lt; \ln a. You should look it up (and make sure I haven't made any mistakes) lol
 
f(a)=\ln a a +1 - a \geq 0
For a = 1 you have f(1)=0, so it's correct.
f&#039;(a)= \frac{a}{a} + \ln a - 1 = \ln a
which is always greater than 0, so you have a monotonically growing function.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top