Your thoughts on the Lord of the Rings series

  • Thread starter Thread starter pinball1970
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Books Literature
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on personal introductions to "The Lord of the Rings" books and their profound impact on readers, often beginning in adolescence. Participants express a deep admiration for Tolkien's world-building and storytelling, highlighting the series' uniqueness in 20th-century literature. Many readers have re-engaged with the books multiple times, while opinions on the film adaptations vary; some appreciate them for capturing the essence of the novels, while others criticize the Hobbit trilogy for its perceived shortcomings. The conversation also touches on the cultural significance of Tolkien's work and its influence on the fantasy genre. Overall, the series remains a cherished part of many readers' lives, showcasing its lasting legacy.
  • #31
Vanadium 50 said:
And why did Aragon get to be the King of Men? He's descended from elves. He married an elf. Should not Men follow their own destiny, out from the thumb of the elves? And who decides?
Because he is Aragorn son of Arathorn, also called Elessar the Elfstone, Dunadan. The heir of Isildur Elendil's son of Gondor. He holds the Sword that was Broken and is forged again.
 
Science news on Phys.org
  • #32
Vanadium 50 said:
Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses!
.....not from some farcical aquatic ceremony
 
  • #34
pinball1970 said:
I tried the Hobbit when I was 11 and found it too childish and silly.
I can't recall when I got the chance to read it, but it was after both LOTR and Silmarillion.
Did not made an impact. I don't think I could finish it. I can't even recall if I did or not.

What I found funny about Silmarillion was that with all that compressed and dry storytelling the whole LOTR books got done in a few sentences.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #35
Vanadium 50 said:
And why did Aragon get to be the King of Men? He's descended from elves. He married an elf. Should not Men follow their own destiny, out from the thumb of the elves? And who decides?

Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses!
Foolish men! Bereft of the succor of Aragon Minas Tirith falls before the might of Sauron. Do you pine for a taste of that kettle o' fish?
 
Last edited:
  • #36
Janus said:
From the wiki page on Quenya
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quenya

Tolkien took an interest in the Finnish mythology of the Kalevala, then became acquainted with Finnish, which he found to provide an aesthetically pleasing inspiration for his High-elven language. Many years later, he wrote: "It was like discovering a complete wine-cellar filled with bottles of an amazing wine of a kind and flavour never tasted before. It quite intoxicated me."[T 2] Regarding the inspiration for Quenya, Tolkien wrote that:
Finnish is a Mongolian language unrelated to Indo-European.

In Bali I had a Finnish neighbor. He moved out and left some Finnish books behind. I took them to an open library in a restaurant where I happened to spy a young lady who had the Mongolian cheekbones and blond hair of a Finn. Would you like to have these books? She was and she would.
 
Last edited:
  • #37
Bandersnatch said:
With not much care given to being the easy read I remembered.
Easy!?! Forsooth!
 
  • #38
pinball1970 said:
Impressive. The only Elvish word I know is "melon."
I actually composed music to many of the poems/songs. (Long before Howard Shore came along and mostly blew away my puny efforts.)

"Into the West" is one of my favorite songs of all time, even though the non-Tolkien lyrics are a bit clumsy compared to JRR. E.g., "And dream of the ones who came before" is a touch clumsy when sung with the music. Imho, "And dream of those who came before" would have been better.

Except for...

Ai! laurië lantar lassi súrinen,
yéni únótimë ve rámar aldaron!

[...]

For that, I still like my composition better than what was in the film, although mine is not really a Gregorian chant as Tolkien apparently intended. :oldsmile:

pinball1970 said:
Frustratingly they also put Legolas in the place of Glorfindel in the race from the Nazgul.
Huh? In the film, Arwen saves Frodo from the Nazgul, not Legolas. I didn't like that substitution initially, but now I don't mind it. The closeness of the horse chase was a bit implausible in places, but I absolutely loved that scene at the Ford of Bruinen with Arwen rampant, challenging the Nazgul.

pinball1970 said:
The worst part was all that stuff with Arwen.
JRR once admitted that he always had difficulty with female characters. He tended to put them up on remote unobtainable pedestals, whereas Jackson's version is more of a "modern" woman.

I didn't mind the rest of the stuff with Arwen. Even now, when I re-read the Tale of Aragorn & Arwen it makes me feel quite sad at the end.

I almost hope they never make a film about the Tale of Beren & Luthien. The older I get, the more horrible it feels.

pinball1970 said:
Anyway the film series is still great. One has to forget the books to enjoy it properly.
I just wish Cate Blanchett had actually studied the LoTR books properly beforehand. She doesn't really grok the true depths of Galadriel, imho. (See "Unfinished Tales" if you don't know what I mean.)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #39
Vanadium 50 said:
And why did Aragon get to be the King of Men? He's descended from elves. He married an elf.
Sheesh. I hope you're just trolling, as usual.

Aragon and Arwen united the long-sundered lines of the half-elven, i.e., Elrond, and Elros (1st king of Numenor). Haven't you read the Silmarillion??

[Hmm, I'm almost embarassed by how much I know about LoTR.]
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #40
strangerep said:
Huh? In the film, Arwen saves Frodo from the Nazgul, not Legolas. I didn't like that substitution initially, but now I don't mind it. The closeness of the horse chase was a bit implausible in places, but I absolutely loved that scene at the Ford of Bruinen with Arwen rampant, challenging the Nazgul.JRR once admitted that he always had difficulty with female characters. He tended to put them up on remote unobtainable pedestals, whereas Jackson's version is more of a "modern" woman.
1978 it was Legolas and Arwen in the film both missed Glorfindel revealing himself as an Elf lord.

The women are mainly secondary even though Galadriel is one of the most ancient and powerful elves in the story.
The mirror of Galadriel is her most significant part of the book probably, still smallish.
Arwen pretty insignificant and for me only Eowyn has a really significant part.
 
  • #41
DennisN said:
1. My neighbor of the same age as me handed me The Hobbit and told me to read it.

2. I was about 15 years old. It had a big impact on me, it introduced me to fantasy literature and soon afterwards I read The Lord of the Rings too, of course. That same friend also recommended Watership Down, which I also loved (the story about rabbits, with some flavors of fantasy too).

3. Well... what is not special about them? :)
The work of Tolkien is pretty much unique (at least at first, now there are loads of fantasy literature).

Tolkien wasn't the very first fantasy author, but his immense talent for in-depth world building, race (elf, dwarf etc.) building, language building etc. along with compelling storytelling made a huge impact on our culture and propelled the fantasy genre into widespread popularity in a modern age.

4. Pretty good, I think. And as I said above, Tolkien was pretty unique, and hugely influential.

5. I liked the films. My favorite is the first one. I thought there was an extra touch of wonder and fairy tale magic to the first film. I rank it as a 5++ on a scale from 1 to 5.
The only fantasy I encountered before LOTR was CS Lewis, Narnia series and Roald Dahl.
There was a great series called, “Tim and hidden people,” quite dark for a children’s book but I loved it.
It was for 8 year olds or something but it was new in our library and I like the pictures on the cover!

“Watership Down” was great as was “Duncton Wood,” (I read as an adult) and “The Weirdstone of Brisingamen.”

The Hobbit seemed silly to me by the time I read it, same with books like Toad of Toad hall and Lewis Carrol, never got into those.
I tried again with some of those classics but could not read them, it was LOTR or horror from then on and horror fell by the wayside because we had to start reading proper English Literature by then.

As an Adult I tried David Eddings, Stephen Donaldson, Jim Abercrombie and others all ok in their own way.

Very rare I read fiction these days.
 
  • #42
Hornbein said:
Finnish is a Mongolian language unrelated to Indo-European.

In Bali I had a Finnish neighbor. He moved out and left some Finnish books behind. I took them to an open library in a restaurant where I happened to spy a young lady who had the Mongolian cheekbones and blond hair of a Finn. Would you like to have these books? She was and she would.
Though Finnish myself ( born in US, but all my grandparents were born in Finland), I never learned the language growing up, even though my parents spoke it. (about the most I knew was, Jo and Ei for yes and no, and how to pronounce sauna properly.) This is something I've always regretted. It wasn't until a couple of years ago, when I finally found an app that covered it that I began to pick up some more.
Even without understanding the language, I remember that during the scene where Arwen cast her spell over the river, that her chant hit chords that reminded me of the Finnish I heard my parents conversing in.
 
  • #43
DaveC426913 said:
Not sure why everyone's down on the Hobbit Trilogy. Is it by comparison to the book?
Those movies were doomed from the get-go.
  • It is the rare prequel indeed that is as good as the original.
  • Many of the stakeholders wantyed another Grand Epic, and that's npt really what the story is.
  • There is about 25% as much source material for the same length of films.
  • The source was really,.if not a children's story, at least a Youbng Adult story.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #44
Hornbein said:
Finnish is a Mongolian language unrelated to Indo-European.
Dont think that is correct, Finnish is Uralic and cannot find any reference that states any relation to Mongolian languages
300px-Uralic_languages_%28_ALL_LANGUAGES_%29.png
 
  • #45
BWV said:
Dont think that is correct, Finnish is Uralic and cannot find any reference that states any relation to Mongolian languages
View attachment 329225
I thought Mongolian languages were Uralic. Maybe not. It was twenty years ago that I looked that this stuff. Anyway, not Indo-European.
 
  • #46
pinball1970 said:
1978 it was Legolas [..]
Ah. I saw the animated film when it came out, but was very disappointed. I now remember very little of it, except how ridiculous was their depiction of the balrog.
 
  • #47
pinball1970 said:
Very rare I read fiction these days.
I'd have said the same thing, except that I now read quite a few MOND papers, too much of which is crack(pot) fiction, imho. :oldfrown:
 
  • Haha
Likes DennisN and pinball1970
  • #48
Hornbein said:
Finnish is a Mongolian language unrelated to Indo-European.

In Bali I had a Finnish neighbor. He moved out and left some Finnish books behind. I took them to an open library in a restaurant where I happened to spy a young lady who had the Mongolian cheekbones and blond hair of a Finn. Would you like to have these books? She was and she would.
My ex was Hungarian and mentioned Finnish, same family or something.
 
  • #49
pinball1970 said:
Very rare I read fiction these days.

pinball1970 said:
My ex was Hungarian and mentioned Finnish, same family or something.
They're both Uralic languages. They say it is difficult to cross over to Indo-European and vice versa.

Hungarian has a lot of the same ts sounds as Chinese, at least to my quite limited exposure.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #50
strangerep said:
united the long-sundered lines
Yeah, yeah, yeah. Divine right of kings, rolyal blood and all that.

The Royal House of Gondor mucked it up in Numenor, and then abandoned Gondor to go camping - for something like a thousand years. If you want a modern example, what would the reaction of His Majesty King Charles be to someone who comes in saying "Hi, Chucky-boy. I'm Billy Plantagenet and I think you're sitting in my chair. Off you go!"
 
  • #51
pinball1970 said:
How were you introduced to the books?
Heard of The Hobbit from a friend in 7th grade, got it and read it--if not all at one sitting, then pretty close to it. Found out that LoTR was a sequel, got those books and read them. Not really possible to do that at one sitting or even close to it, but I devoured them.

pinball1970 said:
What impact did the books have on you?
They provide a nice alternate world to go to when I want a break from this one. I've lost count of the number of times I've re-read the books.

pinball1970 said:
and....what did you think of the film?
Mostly couldn't stand them. See here:

http://blog.peterdonis.com/opinions/tolkiens-ring.html

pinball1970 said:
The Silmarillion is included
Yep, I bought a hardcover of the first edition (still have it squirreled away somewhere) as soon as I found out about it. I was actually disappointed that it didn't include more.

Also I think Unfinished Tales deserves mention, since it filled in more details about many items of interest.
 
  • Love
Likes strangerep and pinball1970
  • #52
Vanadium 50 said:
How do we know that Sauron was evil?
Just from the hints in LotR proper, we actually don't have much direct evidence; it's all indirect, from his enemies, who as you note are hardly disinterested. (Although Elrond does admit that even Sauron was not evil in the beginning.) The Silmarillion (including Akallabeth and Of The Rings of Power) does a much better job of documenting the direct evidence against him.

Vanadium 50 said:
why did Aragon get to be the King of Men? He's descended from elves.
From one half-elf who chose to be human (Elros). But Elros married a human, and so did all of his descendants. So Aragorn has, what, one one-hundred-tenth elven blood (if I've counted his ancestors correctly through the first few Kings of Numenor, the Lords of Andunie, the Kings of Arnor and Arthedain, and the Chieftains of the Dunedain of the North--I think it comes to 55 generations), with all the rest human. I think that counts as human.

Vanadium 50 said:
He married an elf.
A half-elf who, by choosing to marry him, chose to be human, just as Elros did. Sure, it seems strange to us, but hey, I didn't make these rules, Eru did. Take it up with him.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #53
Vanadium 50 said:
what would the reaction of His Majesty King Charles be to someone who comes in saying "Hi, Chucky-boy. I'm Billy Plantagenet and I think you're sitting in my chair. Off you go!"
Well, Charles isn't a Ruling Steward ruling in the name of the King. He is the King. Sure, there were a few intervening changes of dynasty by force, but hey, it's good to be the King.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #54
pinball1970 said:
My ex was Hungarian and mentioned Finnish, same family or something.
Along with Estonian( and some much less widely spoken languages), they all are in the Finno-Ugric family.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #55
PeterDonis said:
Charles isn't a Ruling Steward
No, but his predecessors Charles I and II were Ruling Stuarts!
 
  • Wow
  • Skeptical
Likes pinball1970 and PeterDonis
  • #56
Should I start with the Silmarillion? The first time I read it I realised I was going to have to take notes.
Now I can just print off family trees and maps from the net!
Much easier.
I tried to get one gf to read it and she just couldn't get into it (LOTR) or she was busy washing her hair or something but when she was expecting, she surprised me by asking me to read it to her.
Besides getting something akin to laryngitis, it was a great way to explore the book again. She asked questions I did not think of.
She cried like a baby when we got through Moria, again when the fellowship split and several other times. The ending was rough, I probably cooked her a nice dinner that day! Soften the blow.
 
  • #57
pinball1970 said:
she surprised me by asking me to read it to her
I never read it until I was looking around for something to read to my first born in my promote reading in the offspring program. The program worked great and he reads quite well. Also learned swimming well (different program).

It is definitely fantasy and not the harder sci-fi I usually like.
Entertaining nevertheless.
 
  • Like
Likes pinball1970
  • #58
I assume that the "Wow" means "best pun all year",. right?

I've poked some fun at Tolkein, partly because some of his fans take it a bit too seriously (Do balrogs have wings?) But it's best understood as Epic Myth, and as such has all the shortcomings of Epic Myth. One of those is that characters are either entirely good or entirely evii. There is relatively little nuance. Saruman was corrupted by using the Palantr (It's true! TV does rot your brain!) and not beause he intrinsically felt that the ends justify the means.

His books have ideas about race and genetic density that are. to put it politely and mildly, old fashioned. Of course Tolkein was a product of his time But there is stll a sense of interchangability of his non-Man characters. What differences of opinion is there betweem say Dwalin and Oin? Dwarves is dwarves, and elves is elves and orcs is orcs and that's all there is to it.

Steve Brust did a much better job of characterizing his "elfs" - they have their own motivations, their own desires, their own conflicts.
 
  • #59
Hornbein said:
They're both Uralic languages. They say it is difficult to cross over to Indo-European and vice versa.
An example: welcome in Danish, Icelandic, Norwegian, Swedish, and Finnish:
Velkommen, Velkominn Velkommen, Välkommen, and Tervetuloa.

Other differences:
No articles in Finnish(the, a, an)
Very little usage of prepositions (to, from, of, by, into, etc.), instead relying on cases:
talo - house(as the subject)
taloa - house(as the object)
talossa in the house
talosta - from/of the house(out of)
talolta - from the house (outside)
talolla- at the house
etc.
adjectives must be in the same case as the noun they refer to:
Punainen omena - red apple(subject)
Punainsta omenaa - red apple(object)
Punianset omenat - red applesVerbs are conjugated depending on the pronoun they are used with:
(minä) olen - I am
(sinä) olet - you are
(me) olemme - we are
( and thus the pronoun is often not even used)

There are 6 verb types, each with different rules on how to conjugate.
For example, Olen is formed from the type 3 verb olla ( to be)
The type 1 verb Etsiä ( to search) would become etsin ( I am searching),
while the type 6 verbs, Paeta( to flee/escape) and vaheta(to age) would become:
Pakenen (I am fleeing ) and vanhenen (I am aging)
 
  • Informative
Likes pinball1970
  • #60
Vanadium 50 said:
I assume that the "Wow" means "best pun all year",. right?
That depends on what you mean by "best". :wink: There wasn't a "groan" emoji so I did what I could.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
8K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K