sosme
- 2
- 0
Your worried about confounders. how a future study could be carried out in which one would not have to worry about confounders. What options would you choose (ignore ethical and feasibility issues for this study - focus on theoretical) (Check all that apply)
1 We will take sisters and give one sister a late epidural, and one sister an early epidural
2 We will randomly choose mothers from a list of those that had late epidurals, and those that did not have late epidurals
3 You could randomize mothers to receive either early epidural, or late epidural
4 None of the above
5 We will match mothers with and without late epidurals based on age
6 We will take the next 100 mothers that come into the labour and delivery wardMy Attempt
I know that I would us Hill's Causal Criteria but I am stuck bwteen 1 and 3 since I think RTCs don't have confounds?. Which ones would be the way to go with reducing confounders
thank you
1 We will take sisters and give one sister a late epidural, and one sister an early epidural
2 We will randomly choose mothers from a list of those that had late epidurals, and those that did not have late epidurals
3 You could randomize mothers to receive either early epidural, or late epidural
4 None of the above
5 We will match mothers with and without late epidurals based on age
6 We will take the next 100 mothers that come into the labour and delivery wardMy Attempt
I know that I would us Hill's Causal Criteria but I am stuck bwteen 1 and 3 since I think RTCs don't have confounds?. Which ones would be the way to go with reducing confounders
thank you
Last edited: