Your worried about confounders. how a future study could be carried

  • Thread starter Thread starter sosme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Future Study
sosme
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Your worried about confounders. how a future study could be carried out in which one would not have to worry about confounders. What options would you choose (ignore ethical and feasibility issues for this study - focus on theoretical) (Check all that apply)

1 We will take sisters and give one sister a late epidural, and one sister an early epidural
2 We will randomly choose mothers from a list of those that had late epidurals, and those that did not have late epidurals
3 You could randomize mothers to receive either early epidural, or late epidural
4 None of the above
5 We will match mothers with and without late epidurals based on age
6 We will take the next 100 mothers that come into the labour and delivery wardMy Attempt

I know that I would us Hill's Causal Criteria but I am stuck bwteen 1 and 3 since I think RTCs don't have confounds?. Which ones would be the way to go with reducing confounders

thank you
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


sosme said:
1 We will take sisters and give one sister a late epidural, and one sister an early epidural
2 We will randomly choose mothers from a list of those that had late epidurals, and those that did not have late epidurals
3 You could randomize mothers to receive either early epidural, or late epidural
4 None of the above
5 We will match mothers with and without late epidurals based on age
6 We will take the next 100 mothers that come into the labour and delivery ward
thank you
Whenever you can practically and ethically randomize treatments, you should do it. You didn't specify the outcome measure, but as long as the treatment, or the lack of it, doesn't pose a danger to the subjects, randomization is the best choice.

Note while randomization is the best way to control for confounding factors, but it's not certain. You always need to check that the randomization worked so that potential confounders are evenly distributed within acceptable limits. You can also match by age within a randomization scheme and it would be a good idea to do so in this particular study assuming you are talking about obstetrical outcomes.
 
Last edited:
Namaste & G'day Postulate: A strongly-knit team wins on average over a less knit one Fundamentals: - Two teams face off with 4 players each - A polo team consists of players that each have assigned to them a measure of their ability (called a "Handicap" - 10 is highest, -2 lowest) I attempted to measure close-knitness of a team in terms of standard deviation (SD) of handicaps of the players. Failure: It turns out that, more often than, a team with a higher SD wins. In my language, that...
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Back
Top