1. Limited time only! Sign up for a free 30min personal tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Z = u^v

  1. Aug 22, 2015 #1
    If I define the complex number z = r exp(i θ) how z = uv, so, how to express u and v in terms of r and θ?

    u(r, θ) = ?
    v(r, θ) = ?

    And the inverse too:

    r(u, v) = ?
    θ(u, v) = ?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 22, 2015 #2

    SteamKing

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper

    Have you looked at this article?

    http://mathworld.wolfram.com/ComplexExponentiation.html
     
  4. Aug 22, 2015 #3

    HallsofIvy

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor

    I don't understand your question. You ask, apparently, for z in terms of "u" and "v" but have not said what "u" and "v" are! Are you referring to the representation of a complex function as "z(x+ iy)= u(x,y)+ iv(x,y)" where u and v are real valued function of the real variables x and y? If so then [itex]z= re^{i\theta}[/itex] is NOT "[itex]u^v[/itex]". [itex]z= re^{i\theta}= r(cos(\theta)+ isin(\theta)[/itex] so that [itex]u= r cos(\theta)[/itex] and [itex]v= r sin(\theta)[/itex].
     
  5. Aug 22, 2015 #4

    mathman

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    I'm not sure what you are looking for, but [itex]u=re^{i\theta},\ v=1[/itex] works.
    However there are an infinite number of possibilities, by using [itex]u=r^ne^{ni\theta}\ and\ v=\frac{1}{n}[/itex].
     
  6. Aug 24, 2015 #5
    Z is a complex number, u is a real number and v is a real number too. Is just another way of express the complex numbers...

    So, is possible convert the expression z = x + i y in z = uv ? Is possible express u and v in terms of x and y?
     
  7. Aug 24, 2015 #6

    Svein

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Well, let's try. You know that [itex]z=x+iy [/itex] can also be expressed as [itex] z=re^{i\phi}[/itex], where [itex] r=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}[/itex] and [itex]\phi = \arcsin(\frac{y}{r}) [/itex]. Therefore, we obviously have [itex] z=e^{\ln r}\cdot e^{i\phi}= e^{\ln r + i\phi}[/itex]. ...
     
  8. Aug 24, 2015 #7
    Yeah! I thought this... but, I was unsatisfied com this 'conversion' and so I posted my doubt here because the most experiente could see something better...

    Anyway! Thank you!
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook




Similar Discussions: Z = u^v
  1. Delta Z (Replies: 12)

  2. Residue of z/cos(z)? (Replies: 15)

  3. Z - transform 1/z-1 (Replies: 0)

Loading...