- #1
dawoodvora
- 5
- 0
Homework Statement
Show by induction that if the finite sets A and B have m and n elements,
respectively, then
(i) A X B has mn elements;
(ii) A has 2m subsets;
(iii) If further A [itex]\cap[/itex] B = [itex]\varphi[/itex], then A [itex]\cup[/itex] B has m+ n elements.
NOTE : I am only interested in the (iii) section of the problem. Section (i) and (ii), I was able to solve albeit with some help.
Homework Equations
The Attempt at a Solution
Here is the attempt at the solution
I am using mathematical induction to solve the query.
P(n) : |A| = m, |B| = n; |A [itex]\cup[/itex] B| = m + n if A [itex]\cap[/itex] B = [itex]\varphi[/itex].Basis Step:
P(n = 1) to be proven as true.
Let A = { a1, a2,...am} => |A| = m
Let B = {b1} => |B| = 1
Now A [itex]\cup[/itex] B = {a1, a2,...am,b1}
|A [itex]\cup[/itex] B| = m + 1 elements, since A and B are disjoint(given) Thus P(1) holds true.
Basis Step is proven.
Let us redefine B = {b1, b2, ..., bk, bk+1} => |B| = k+1.
Also |A [itex]\cap[/itex] B| = [itex]\varphi[/itex]
Now consider Bk = {b1, b2,..., bk} => Bk [itex]\subset[/itex] B, |Bk| = k
Inductive hypothesis:
Assume P(k) holds true for n = k i.e.,
|A [itex]\cup[/itex] Bk| = m + k, when A [itex]\cap[/itex] Bk = [itex]\varphi[/itex]
Inductive Step:
Bk [itex]\subset[/itex] B => B = Bk [itex]\cup[/itex] {bk+1}
A [itex]\cup[/itex] B = A [itex]\cup[/itex] (Bk [itex]\cup[/itex] {bk+1}) = (A [itex]\cup[/itex] Bk) [itex]\cup[/itex] {Bk+1} = m + k + 1 = m + (k + 1) => P(k+1) holds true. Thus Induction is complete.
Somehow, I am not convinced with the solution that I have attempted. Please let me know if I am missing something.