Zangwill, problem 10.19 - A Matching condition for the vector potential A

BearShark
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Show that the normal derivative of the coulomb gauge vector suffers a jump discontinuity at a surface endowed with a current density K(\vec r_s )

Homework Equations


The vector potential A is given by:
A=\frac{\mu_0}{4\pi}\int{\frac{J(x')}{|x-x'|}d^3x}

The magnetic field has a jump in the parallel component given by:
\mu_0K(\vec r_s )=\hat{n}\times(\vec{B_2}-\vec{B_1})

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting with the expression for the jump discontinuity, one can substitute the relation:
B=\nabla\times{A}
to get:
\mu_0K(\vec r_s )=\hat{n}\times(\nabla\times{A_2}-\nabla\times{A_1})

From here I hoped I can distribute the n - hat to get:

\mu_0K(\vec r_s )=\hat{n}\times{\nabla\times{A_2}}-\hat{n}\times{\nabla\times{A_1}}

However, I noticed most vector calculus identities refer to identities where the nabla is the first element, and trying to use the general identities for vectors lead me to have nablas that do not operate on anything. Am I in the right direction? I will appreciate advice on how to tackle this problem.

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suppose you are referring to the "BAC - CAB" rule for the triple cross product, namely
##\vec{A}\times(\vec{B}\times \vec {C})=\vec{B}(\vec{A}\cdot \vec {C})-\vec{C}(\vec{A}\cdot \vec {B} ) ##
Although order of operation matters on the left side, it does not on the right side. The vectors forming the dot products on the right side commute and so do the dot products themselves with the vectors that multiply them. So substitute
##\hat{n} = \vec{A}##, ##\vec{\nabla} = \vec{B}## and ##\vec{A}=\vec{C}##. Then you make a first pass and write
##\hat{n}\times(\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A})=\vec{\nabla}(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{A})-\vec{A}(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{\nabla} ) ##
Finally you make sure the "nabla" has something to operate on and rearrange the second term on the right to get
##\hat{n}\times(\vec{\nabla}\times \vec{A})=\vec{\nabla}(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{A})-(\hat{n}\cdot \vec{\nabla} )\vec{A} ##
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top