Zero Errors in Vernier Calipers and Micrometer Screw Gauge

AI Thread Summary
Zero errors in vernier calipers and micrometer screw gauges can be positive or negative, affecting measurement accuracy. Positive zero error occurs when the scale's zero is misaligned above the main scale, requiring subtraction to correct, while negative zero error occurs when it is below, also requiring subtraction but effectively adding to the measurement. The key to correcting readings lies in understanding whether the error makes the measurement appear larger or smaller than it is. It is crucial to apply the correct sign to the error when subtracting to obtain accurate results. Clear communication about these errors is essential for understanding and preventing measurement inaccuracies.
kunkun
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, I have a question to ask.
On my notes that my teacher gave me, he said that there are some errors in the notes. He had not responded to me which are the errors yet but he said about zero errors in vernier calipers and micrometer screw gauge.

The question is:
On my notes, it says that:

Vernier Calipers

1. Positive zero error occurs when the ‘0’ marking of the vernier scale appears after the ‘0’ marking of the main scale. The error is +x cm. To correct the reading, we subtract the error from the measurement.

2. Negative zero error occurs when the ‘0’ marking of the vernier scale appears before the ‘0’ marking of the main scale. The error is -(0.1-y) cm. To correct the reading, we subtract the error from the measurement.Micrometer Screw Gauge

1. Positive zero error occurs when the ‘0’ marking of the thimble scale is below the horizontal reference line of the main scale. The error is +x mm. To correct the reading, we subtract the error from the measurement.

2. Negative zero error occurs when the ‘0’ marking of the thimble scale is below the horizontal reference line of the main scale. The error is -(0.1-y) mm. To correct the reading, we subtract the error from the measurement.

The problem lies in the sentence: To correct the reading, we subtract/add the error from the measurement.

About the subtracts in all the sentence, may I know which one should be add instead of subtract?

Thanks! :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When talking about errors it is important to use a clear language.
The word "error" can mean so many different things in science.

Your teacher was telling you that there are some mistakes in the text of the notes.
In the section on experimental uncertainty, it talks about systematic errors due to misplacement of the vernier scale. (The manufacturer mistakenly placed the vernier too high or too low.)

The misplacement of the vernier will make the reading too big or too small and you have to correct the measurement for that.

To know if you add or subtract, work out if the misplacement will cause the reading to be too big or too small.
 
Error is always subtracted from the measurement but it is important to remember that the value of the error must be put with its sign. In positive zero error, the value is more than the actual measurement therefore on subtracting we get the actual value. In negative zero error, the apparent value is less than the actual value therefore on subtracting, the negative sign becomes positive and we obtain the real value. This concept is followed in other instruments also like screw gauge and spherometers.
 
Laksh Arora said:
Error is always subtracted from the measurement but it is important to remember that the value of the error must be put with its sign. In positive zero error, the value is more than the actual measurement therefore on subtracting we get the actual value. In negative zero error, the apparent value is less than the actual value therefore on subtracting, the negative sign becomes positive and we obtain the real value. This concept is followed in other instruments also like screw gauge and spherometers.
This concept removes the confusion of when to add or when to subtract. Just subtract the error with sign.
 
Incorrect or misleading concepts often lend a sense of certainty.
This would be a poor treatment of statistical errors, mistakes, and systematic errors where the reading is too low. ( please see post #2 on different mmeanings of "error").

Note: "subtract ... with sign" does not mean anything. Perhaps English is a second language? It can trip you up like that.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Back
Top