Zero Point Energy Calculation for BCC Solids | Chemist

  • Thread starter Thread starter PHY-101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculations
PHY-101
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hi all!

I am a chemist trying to make her way through solid state computational physics problems and I have been stuck with this question for a while and couldn't find a clear answer to it:

What is a Zero Point Energy and especially, how can I calculate this for a bcc solid?

Anyone can help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suggest you look at how the harmonic oscillator is quantized in quantum mechanics. It is simply the ground state energy of the harmonic oscillator, and isn't zero because quantum operators don't commute in general.

Here is a pretty detailed explanation, but might be too technical: http://www.physics.thetangentbundle.net/wiki/Quantum_mechanics/harmonic_oscillator/operator_method
Otherwise I recommend Griffith's QM book.

Now, to the harder part. A solid can be thought of as a lattice of ions with electrons wizzing about. The electrons move quickly enough that they cushion the interaction between ions, and you can very approximately model this by saying that each ion sits inside an (x - x_0)^2 potential, like it's attached to other ions by springs. (Technical: taylor expand the true potential about it's lowest energy stable configuration, and the first non-zero term is quadratic).

Using the fact that the lattice is periodic, you can Fourier transform the whole shebang and write the collection of ions as decoupled harmonic oscillators (in momentum space). One harmonic oscillator for each wave-vector, essentially. Now, a quantum harmonic oscillator possesses a zero point or ground state energy. Now you have 3N such harmonic oscillators, (each with different frequencies), so the solid as a whole has quite a bit of ZPE to go around.

I hope that has helped. The quantization of solids in this way is treated in most condensed matter/solid state textbooks under the treatment of phonons. (The business about Fourier transforming and whatnot is actually classical mechanics. Just a trick to decouple the ions)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good luck with your studies.
 
Mmm, phonons are quasi-particles, but quantum fields, which are a bit more advanced than ordinary quantum mechanics, also possesses zero point energy (for pretty much the same reason). This leads to interesting consequences, e.g. the Casimir effect, and I believe a lot of work has been done to understand the Casimir effect in molecules, and its relation to the van der Waals force. But this isn't a "vibrational" issue and would probably seem a bit like black magic until you feel comfortable with the phonon business. However, I invite you to check it out.
 
Thank you very much, I understand a bit better what it is!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top