Zoom in is equivalent to move forward?

  • Thread starter Thread starter zli034
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalent Zoom
AI Thread Summary
Zooming in on a digital camera is not equivalent to physically moving closer, as zoom affects image compression and perspective. Optical zoom provides true detail by using the lens geometry, while digital zoom merely crops and enlarges the image without adding detail. Photographers utilize these effects to manipulate background perception, with telephoto lenses compressing backgrounds and wide-angle lenses expanding them. Understanding the differences between optical and digital zoom is crucial for effective photography, as optical zoom is far more desirable for capturing detail. Ultimately, mastering these techniques allows for creative control over image composition and subject emphasis.
zli034
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
For the digital cameras, is the zoom-in is equivalent to move forward the camera? My simple camera gives me 5 level zoom in, it has 3X optical zoom, but it takes me to press the button 5 times to reach the highest limit.

Can I determine the forward distance of each zoom-in button pressed? Therefore, instead of using the zoom, next I can just move forward my camera.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No. Zoom in not only pull the image closer, it also compress everything also. I am a photographer. Look at picture taken with a telephoto lens of a person with a far away scenic background. The background look much closer than it really is. This is the compression I am talking about.

For same reason a wide angle lens make the background look farther away. This is the trick of taking picture of people with nice scenic background. I stand close by to the person, use wide angle lens so I can get a lot more of the background to make the picture look very exciting.

The other extreme is if I want to emphasis the person in the picture, then I use a telephoto to take the picture. Because the background get pull in, you don't see a whole lot to keep the attention to the subject. Also with tele zoom, the background usually out of focus so you put more attention to the subject in focus.

You can do a lot of tricks with zooming in and out than just moving closer. I speak as a photographer, look up angle of view, depth of field for scientific explanation. I'm absolutely not an optical engineer.
 
zli034 said:
For the digital cameras, is the zoom-in is equivalent to move forward the camera? My simple camera gives me 5 level zoom in, it has 3X optical zoom, but it takes me to press the button 5 times to reach the highest limit.

Can I determine the forward distance of each zoom-in button pressed? Therefore, instead of using the zoom, next I can just move forward my camera.

All digital cameras have an optical zoom spec and a digital zoom spec. 3x optical and 5x digital is typical.

Optical zoom uses the geometry of the camera lens to do a "real" zoom - i.e. optical zoom provides more detail in that smaller area than un-zoomed. eg. If you couldn't read a license plate at standard setting, you might actually be able to read it when optically zoomed.

Digital zoom simply crops down the existing pic and expands (interpolates) it to fill the frame - i.e. digital zoom does not provide any more detail than when unzoomed. eg. If you couldn't read a license plate at standard setting, you will not be able to read it any better when digitally zoomed.

Digital zoom does nothing that PhotoShopping the picture after-the-fact can't do. You can crop your 4000x3000 pic down to the tiniest detail that only fills 400x300 pixels, then you can increase that little 400x300 image back up to 4000x3000, but there is no more detail in the final 4000x3000 pic than in the 400x300. That's digital zoom.

In conclusion:
Optical zoom: very desirable.
Digital zoom: virtually useless.
 
yungman said:
No. Zoom in not only pull the image closer, it also compress everything also. I am a photographer. Look at picture taken with a telephoto lens of a person with a far away scenic background. The background look much closer than it really is. This is the compression I am talking about.
Just to throw some simple math into this, if you take a picture of two objects, standing 10 feet from one, with the other 10 feet behind, one is 10 feet away and the other is 20 feet away. So if the objects are the same actual size, the further one looks half the size on film.

If you back up 10 feet and zoom in 2x, the near object will appear roughly the same size in the picture, but now the far object appears to be (20+10)/2=15 feet away instead of 20 feet away and is larger in the frame. You can use this effect to screw with the size of objects in a picture, ie to make to vastly different sized objects appear the same size. Google gives some awesome examples, including a woman kissing the Sphinx:

http://www.google.com/search?source...T4ADBF_enUS311US311&q=perspective+photography
 
Just to add to the good answers, optical zoom changes the *angular* magnification. and thus the field of view. The term 'magnification', especially when written as (for example) 5X, is sometimes confused with microscopy, where the term refers to the ratio of the actual sizes of image to the object.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Thread 'Griffith, Electrodynamics, 4th Edition, Example 4.8. (First part)'
I am reading the Griffith, Electrodynamics book, 4th edition, Example 4.8 and stuck at some statements. It's little bit confused. > Example 4.8. Suppose the entire region below the plane ##z=0## in Fig. 4.28 is filled with uniform linear dielectric material of susceptibility ##\chi_e##. Calculate the force on a point charge ##q## situated a distance ##d## above the origin. Solution : The surface bound charge on the ##xy## plane is of opposite sign to ##q##, so the force will be...
Dear all, in an encounter of an infamous claim by Gerlich and Tscheuschner that the Greenhouse effect is inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics I came to a simple thought experiment which I wanted to share with you to check my understanding and brush up my knowledge. The thought experiment I tried to calculate through is as follows. I have a sphere (1) with radius ##r##, acting like a black body at a temperature of exactly ##T_1 = 500 K##. With Stefan-Boltzmann you can calculate...
Back
Top