Calculating flux using surface integrals.

In summary, the conversation was about a problem in vector calculus involving evaluating a surface integral. The problem involved calculating the surface integral \int\int_{\Sigma}f*d\sigma, where f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk, and the surface \Sigma is a part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit normal n pointing in the positive z direction. The conversation also included the equations and attempts at solving the problem, such as parametrizing the surface, calculating the outward unit normal and the cross product of the partial derivatives, and evaluating the
  • #1
thepatient
164
0
This isn't homework. I've been restudying vector calculus from the beginning to end on my free time and got stuck on this problem. I am not sure what I'm doing wrong, but it may be a calculation error since it has so much calculation involved.

Homework Statement


Evaluate the surface integral [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{\Sigma}[/itex]f*d[itex]\sigma[/itex], where f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk and is the
part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit
normal n pointing in the positive z direction.

Homework Equations


[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{\Sigma}[/itex]f*d[itex]\sigma[/itex] = [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex]f*n*d[itex]\sigma[/itex], where
d[itex]\sigma[/itex] = |[itex]dr/du[/itex] X [itex]dr/dv[/itex]|dudv, and r is a vector parametricized for the surface.

n = outward unit normal vector from the surface.

The Attempt at a Solution


First, I parametricized the surface as a vector in terms of u and v:
x = u
y = v
z = 2 -3x - 1.5y
[itex]\overline{r}[/itex](u,v) = <u, v, 2-3u - 1.5v>
R is the region on the u, v plane under the line v = 2 -2u, u≥0, v≥0
Took partial derivatives in terms of u and v:
d[itex]\overline{r}[/itex]/du = <1, 0, -3>
d[itex]\overline{r}[/itex]/dv = <0,1,-1.5>

Calculated |[itex]dr/du[/itex] X [itex]dr/dv[/itex]|:
i j k
1 0 -3
0 1 -1.5 =
|3i + 1.5j + k| = (9 + 2.25 + 1)^1/2 = 3.5

Calculated n:
Since the plane is 6x + 3y + 2z = 6, perpendicular to the plane would be the vector v = <6, 3, 2>, so n would be v/(|v|), the vector divided by its magnitude.
n = <6, 3, 2>/|7| = <6/7, 3/7, 2/7>

Calculating f(u,v) * n:
f(u,v) = <(u^2), (uv), (2 -3u - 1.5v)>* <6/7, 3/7, 2/7> =
1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v)

Plugging into equation:
[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex]f*n*d[itex]\sigma[/itex] R=[(u,v): 0<u<1, 0<v<2-2u]

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex] 1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v) *(3.5) *dvdu =

1/2 [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex]6u^2 + 3uv -6u - 3v + 4 dv du =
1/2 [itex]\int[/itex]6u^2v + 3uv^2 -3v^2/2 + 4v (evaluating v from 0 to 2-2u) dv

Using wolfram alpha to evaluate (got tired of doing it by hand like 6 times XD) :
1/2 [itex]\int[/itex]24u^3 + 30u^2 + 8u + 2 du from u = 0..1
1/2 * (24u^4/4 + 30u^3/3 + 8u^2/2 + 2u) from 0 to 1
1/2 (6 + 10+4+2) = 11

The answer should be 15/4 though. I'm not sure what I did wrong, maybe I missed something. Can anyone see what I did wrong in this problem? Thanks much.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know if it's just a typo, but you dropped the term -6u from the integrand on the step where you simplified 3.5/7 to 1/2 and reordered the terms.

EDIT: I get 7/4 as well.
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Oops. I redid it and got 13/2 with the -6u term. It came out to 13/2 though. :(
 
  • #4
If I remember correctly, since the surface Σ is closed, the divergence theorem applies right?

∫∫Rf*n*dσ = ∫∫∫div(f) dV

x is from 0 to one
y is from 0 to the line -2x + 2
z is from 0 to the plane 3 - 3x -3y/2

f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk
div(f) = d/dx i + d/dy j + d/dz k * x^2i + xyj + zk
= 2x + x + 1 = 3x+1

∫∫∫div(f) dV = ∫∫∫3x+1 dzdydx
∫∫3xz+z | z = 0..3-3x-3y/2 dy dx
∫∫3x(3-3x-3y) + 3-3x-3y -[ 0] dydx
∫∫9x -9x^2 - 9xy +3 -3x - 3y dy dx
∫∫6x - 9x^2 -9xy +3 -3y dy dx
∫6xy - 9x^2y - 9xy^2/2 + 3y - 3y^2/2 | y = 0..-2x+2 dx
∫6x(-2x+2) - 9x^2(-2x+2) -9x(-2x+2)^2/2 +3(-2x+2) -3(-2x+2)^2/2 dx
∫-12x^2 + 12x +18x^3-18x^2-(9x/2) (4x^2 -8x + 4) -6x + 6 -3(4x^2 - 8x + 4) dx=
∫-12x^2 + 12x + 18x^3 -18x^2 -36x^3/2 + 72x^2/2 -36x/2 + 6 -12x^2 +24x - 12 dx=
-12x^3/3 + 12x^2/2 + 18x^4/4 -18x^3/3 -36x^4/8 + 72x^3/6 - 36x^2/4 +6x -12x^3/3 +12x^2 -12x from x =0..1
-12/3 + 12/2 + 18/4 -18/3 -36/8 +12 -9 +6 -4 + 12-12 =1


:\ I'm frustrated with this problem.
 
  • #5
You don't have a closed surface. You're calculating the flux only on one plane. The volume integral of the divergence would equal the total flux through the plane and the other three sides of the tetrahedron.
 
  • #6
Hmm.. But the problem states "...part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit normal n pointing in the positive z direction." That doesn't mean that the flux is the net flux of the closed surface, but the flux of only that portion of the plane?
 
  • #7
thepatient said:
First, I parametricized the surface as a vector in terms of u and v:
x = u
y = v
z = 2 -3x - 1.5y
You solved for z incorrectly. It should be z = 3 - 3x - (3/2)y = 3 - 3u - (3/2)v.
[itex]\overline{r}[/itex](u,v) = <u, v, 2-3u - 1.5v>
R is the region on the u, v plane under the line v = 2 -2u, u≥0, v≥0
Took partial derivatives in terms of u and v:
d[itex]\overline{r}[/itex]/du = <1, 0, -3>
d[itex]\overline{r}[/itex]/dv = <0,1,-1.5>

Calculated |[itex]dr/du[/itex] X [itex]dr/dv[/itex]|:
i j k
1 0 -3
0 1 -1.5 =
|3i + 1.5j + k| = (9 + 2.25 + 1)^1/2 = 3.5

Calculated n:
Since the plane is 6x + 3y + 2z = 6, perpendicular to the plane would be the vector v = <6, 3, 2>, so n would be v/(|v|), the vector divided by its magnitude.
n = <6, 3, 2>/|7| = <6/7, 3/7, 2/7>
All this is fine.
Calculating f(u,v) * n:
f(u,v) = <(u^2), (uv), (2 -3u - 1.5v)>* <6/7, 3/7, 2/7> =
1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v)
You propagated the error from above, but your method is okay. With the correct expression for z, you would get
[tex]\frac{1}{2}\int_0^1\int_0^{2(1-u)} (6u^2+3uv+6-6u-3v)\,dv\,du = \frac{7}{4}[/tex]
Plugging into equation:
[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex]f*n*d[itex]\sigma[/itex] R=[(u,v): 0<u<1, 0<v<2-2u]

[itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex] 1/7 (6u^2 +3uv + 4 - 6u - 3v) *(3.5) *dvdu =

1/2 [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex][itex]_{R}[/itex]6u^2 + 3uv -6u - 3v + 4 dv du =
1/2 [itex]\int[/itex]6u^2v + 3uv^2 -3v^2/2 + 4v (evaluating v from 0 to 2-2u) dv

Using wolfram alpha to evaluate (got tired of doing it by hand like 6 times XD) :
1/2 [itex]\int[/itex]24u^3 + 30u^2 + 8u + 2 du from u = 0..1
1/2 * (24u^4/4 + 30u^3/3 + 8u^2/2 + 2u) from 0 to 1
1/2 (6 + 10+4+2) = 11

The answer should be 15/4 though. I'm not sure what I did wrong, maybe I missed something. Can anyone see what I did wrong in this problem? Thanks much.
 
  • #8
thepatient said:
Hmm.. But the problem states "...part of the plane 6x + 3y + 2z = 6 with x ≥ 0, y ≥ 0, and z ≥ 0, with the outward unit normal n pointing in the positive z direction." That doesn't mean that the flux is the net flux of the closed surface, but the flux of only that portion of the plane?
Yes, I think so, otherwise it wouldn't specify which direction the normal points in.EDIT: It turns out you get the same answer, 7/4, because the vector field vanishes on the other three faces, so there's no flux through them.
 
  • #9
thepatient said:
If I remember correctly, since the surface Σ is closed, the divergence theorem applies right?

∫∫Rf*n*dσ = ∫∫∫div(f) dV

x is from 0 to one
y is from 0 to the line -2x + 2
z is from 0 to the plane 3 - 3x -3y/2

f(x, y, z) = x2i + xyj + zk
div(f) = d/dx i + d/dy j + d/dz k * x^2i + xyj + zk
= 2x + x + 1 = 3x+1

∫∫∫div(f) dV = ∫∫∫3x+1 dzdydx
∫∫3xz+z | z = 0..3-3x-3y/2 dy dx
∫∫3x(3-3x-3y) + 3-3x-3y -[ 0] dydx
You dropped the factor of 1/2 on the y term.

I would pull the (3x+1) out front since it's a constant for the y and z integrations: [tex]\int_0^1 (3x+1)\int_0^{2(1-x)} \int_0^{3-3x-3/2 y}dz\,dy\,dx[/tex]It'll simplify the algebra a bit. After you integrate over z, you'll have[tex]\int_0^1 (3x+1)\int_0^{2(1-x)} (3-3x-3/2 y)\,dy\,dx = \int_0^1 3(3x+1)\int_0^{2(1-x)} [(1-x)-y/2]\,dy\,dx[/tex]
If you keep things in terms of 1-x, I think the result of the y integral will be pretty simple. To do the x integration, you'll just have to bite the bullet and multiply it out, or try the substitution u=1-x.
∫∫9x -9x^2 - 9xy +3 -3x - 3y dy dx
∫∫6x - 9x^2 -9xy +3 -3y dy dx
∫6xy - 9x^2y - 9xy^2/2 + 3y - 3y^2/2 | y = 0..-2x+2 dx
∫6x(-2x+2) - 9x^2(-2x+2) -9x(-2x+2)^2/2 +3(-2x+2) -3(-2x+2)^2/2 dx
∫-12x^2 + 12x +18x^3-18x^2-(9x/2) (4x^2 -8x + 4) -6x + 6 -3(4x^2 - 8x + 4) dx=
∫-12x^2 + 12x + 18x^3 -18x^2 -36x^3/2 + 72x^2/2 -36x/2 + 6 -12x^2 +24x - 12 dx=
-12x^3/3 + 12x^2/2 + 18x^4/4 -18x^3/3 -36x^4/8 + 72x^3/6 - 36x^2/4 +6x -12x^3/3 +12x^2 -12x from x =0..1
-12/3 + 12/2 + 18/4 -18/3 -36/8 +12 -9 +6 -4 + 12-12 =1:\ I'm frustrated with this problem.
Either way, you should get 7/4 for the answer, so I wouldn't bother beating your head against the wall to try get 15/4. That answer is apparently wrong.
 
  • #10
You're right. I should just try the problems on my other calculus book. This book was a free online book which I think didn't have much revisement. Thanks much for your help. :]
 

1. What is flux and why is it important in surface integrals?

Flux is a measure of the flow of a vector field through a surface. It is important in surface integrals because it allows us to calculate the amount of a vector field passing through a surface, which is useful in various physical and mathematical applications.

2. What is the formula for calculating flux using surface integrals?

The formula for calculating flux using surface integrals is given by: ∫∫F ⋅ dS, where F is the vector field and dS is the differential element of surface area.

3. How do you determine the orientation of the surface in flux calculations?

The orientation of the surface is determined by the direction of the normal vector, which is usually given in the problem or can be calculated using the cross product of two tangent vectors on the surface.

4. Can flux be negative in surface integrals?

Yes, flux can be negative in surface integrals. This occurs when the vector field is pointing in the opposite direction of the normal vector, resulting in a negative dot product and a negative flux value.

5. What are some real-world applications of calculating flux using surface integrals?

Calculating flux using surface integrals is used in various fields such as fluid mechanics, electromagnetism, and heat transfer. It is used to determine fluid flow rates, electric and magnetic field strengths, and heat transfer rates through surfaces.

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
167
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
585
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
620
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top