Proof for exponentials

  • Thread starter island-boy
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Proof
These are all the relevant posts I could find...In summary, the limit as n approaches infinity of (1 + x/n)^n is equal to e^x and this can be proven using the binomial theorem and the definition of e^x as the Taylor series about x=0. However, there may be some issues with uniform convergence when taking the limit, and the argument is not completely rigorous.
  • #1
island-boy
99
0
hello, I need the proof to show that:
[tex]
e^x = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+x/n)^n
[/tex]

Here's what I was able to come up with so far:
since the derivative of [tex]e^x[/tex] is also [tex]e^x[/tex],

then let f(x) = [tex]e^x[/tex]
thus:
D(f(x)) = [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{f(x+h) - f(x)}{h} = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{e^{x+h} - e^x}{h} = e^x\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{e^h - 1}{h}[/tex]

so for the derivative of [tex]e^x[/tex] to equal itself,
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{e^h - 1}{h} = 1[/tex]

so for small values of h, we can write:
[tex]e^h - 1 = h[/tex]
and so
[tex] e = (1+h)^{1/h}[/tex]

Replacing h by 1/n, we get:
[tex] e = (1 + 1/n)^n[/tex]
As n gets larger and approaches infinity, we get:
[tex]e = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+1/n)^n[/tex]

so, how do I get:
[tex]
e^x = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+x/n)^n
[/tex]

Also, is it true that:
[tex](1+x/n)^n \leq e^x[/tex] and
[tex](1-x/n)^n \leq e^{-x}[/tex] for every natural n and every x element of X?
How can I prove this?

thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
island-boy said:
hello, I need the proof to show that:
[tex]
e^x = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+x/n)^n
[/tex]
...
thanks!
Have you tried the Binomial theorem ?
 
  • #3
I would've taken the expression for e and raised both sides to the x power.

so for small values of h, we can write:
You really ought to do this more rigorously...

P.S. many of the limits in your limits are wrong.
 
  • #4
As a hint, set 1/u=x/n, and re-express in terms of u and x.
 
  • #5
Hurkyl said:
I would've taken the expression for e and raised both sides to the x power.You really ought to do this more rigorously...

P.S. many of the limits in your limits are wrong.

which one of the limits are wrong?

I was able to prove that:
[tex] (1 + x/n)^n \leq e^x [/tex] and [tex] (1 - x/n)^n \leq e^{-x} [/tex]

Using the Taylor expansion for [tex]e^x[/tex], I got

[tex]e^x = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} + ...[/tex]
which means
[tex]e^x \geq 1 + x[/tex]
subtituting x by x/n, I get
[tex]e^{x/n} \geq 1 + x/n[/tex]
thus
[tex]e^{(x/n)n} \geq (1 + x/n)^n[/tex]
simplifying, I get:
[tex]e^x \geq (1 + x/n)^n [/tex]

Similarly I used the Taylor Expnansion to prove that
[tex]
e^x = \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+x/n)^n
[/tex]

since [tex]e^x = 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} +...[/tex]

and using binomial theorem for [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+x/n)^n[/tex]
I got:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty}1^n + \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} x + \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{n(n-1)(x^2)}{(n^2)(2!)} + \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)(x^3)}{(n^3)(3!)} + \lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)(n-3)(x^4)}{(n^4)(4!)} + ...

= 1 + x + \frac{x^2}{2!} + \frac{x^3}{3!} +...

=e^x
[/tex]

these correct?
 
Last edited:
  • #6
You've used n-->infinity in expressions that don't even have an n in them! (You meant h-->0)
 
  • #7
See this thread posts # 3 and 12.

I take it that your definition for [tex]e^x[/tex] is the Taylor series about x=0, viz.

[tex]e^x=\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{x^k}{k!}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
  • #8
Essentially, this

benorin said:
That [tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow\infty} (1+\frac{x}{n})^n = e^x[/tex] may be proven as follows:

by the binomial theorem,

[tex](1+\frac{x}{n})^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{n!}{k!(n-k)!}\left( \frac{x}{n}\right) ^{k} = \sum_{k=0}^{n} \frac{n!}{(n-k)!}\frac{1}{n^{k}} \frac{x^k}{k!}\rightarrow \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \frac{x^k}{k!}=:e^{x}\mbox{ as }n\rightarrow\infty[/tex]

since [tex] \frac{n!}{(n-k)!}\frac{1}{n^{k}} \rightarrow 1 \mbox{ as }n\rightarrow\infty[/tex]

although there are some uniform convergence issues to be handled when taking the limit of the above sum...

and this,

benorin said:
This is not rigorous, but it works...

[tex] \frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = \frac{n(n-1)(n-2)\cdots (n-(k-1))(n-k)!}{(n-k)!} =n(n-1)(n-2)\cdots (n-(k-1))[/tex]

counting the number of terms in the above product: it goes n-0 through n-(k-1) so there are (k-1)-0+1 = k terms so we know that the leading term will be nk when the product is expanded, and hence

[tex] \frac{n!}{(n-k)!} = n^k + \mbox{ some polynomial of degree k-1 in }n[/tex]

or rather

[tex] \frac{n!}{(n-k)!}\frac{1}{n^{k}} \rightarrow 1 \mbox{ as }n\rightarrow\infty[/tex]
 

1. What is the proof for exponentials?

The proof for exponentials is a mathematical process that shows how the properties of exponents work. It involves using algebraic manipulations and logical reasoning to demonstrate the rules and laws that govern exponential functions.

2. Why do we need a proof for exponentials?

A proof for exponentials is necessary to fully understand and utilize the properties of exponential functions. It allows us to confidently use these functions in various mathematical and scientific applications without any doubts or uncertainties.

3. How does the proof for exponentials work?

The proof for exponentials involves breaking down complex exponential expressions into simpler forms, using known rules and properties of exponents. This allows us to manipulate and rearrange the expressions to prove that the properties hold true in all cases.

4. Are there different proofs for different types of exponentials?

Yes, there are different proofs for different types of exponentials. For example, the proof for natural exponentials (exponential functions with a base of e) may differ from the proof for power exponentials (exponential functions with a base of any number other than e).

5. Can you provide an example of a proof for exponentials?

One example of a proof for exponentials is the proof of the product rule, which states that when multiplying two exponential expressions with the same base, we can add their exponents. This can be proven by breaking down the expressions, manipulating them, and showing that the result follows the same pattern as the original expressions.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
619
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
690
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
945
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
665
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
711
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
477
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
264
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top