A mathematical proof is an inferential argument for a mathematical statement, showing that the stated assumptions logically guarantee the conclusion. The argument may use other previously established statements, such as theorems; but every proof can, in principle, be constructed using only certain basic or original assumptions known as axioms, along with the accepted rules of inference. Proofs are examples of exhaustive deductive reasoning which establish logical certainty, to be distinguished from empirical arguments or non-exhaustive inductive reasoning which establish "reasonable expectation". Presenting many cases in which the statement holds is not enough for a proof, which must demonstrate that the statement is true in all possible cases. An unproven proposition that is believed to be true is known as a conjecture, or a hypothesis if frequently used as an assumption for further mathematical work.Proofs employ logic expressed in mathematical symbols, along with natural language which usually admits some ambiguity. In most mathematical literature, proofs are written in terms of rigorous informal logic. Purely formal proofs, written fully in symbolic language without the involvement of natural language, are considered in proof theory. The distinction between formal and informal proofs has led to much examination of current and historical mathematical practice, quasi-empiricism in mathematics, and so-called folk mathematics, oral traditions in the mainstream mathematical community or in other cultures. The philosophy of mathematics is concerned with the role of language and logic in proofs, and mathematics as a language.
The question arises the way Goldstein proves Euler theorem (3rd Ed pg 150-156 ) which says:
" In three-dimensional space, any displacement of a rigid body such that
a point on the rigid body remains fixed, is equivalent to a single rotation about some axis that runs through the fixed point"...
Hello everyone, I am preparing to write an exam project in college about special relativity, however i am missing the critical experiment to prove that it is true. I thought about using the life time of muons, but i don't have a scintillator to detect them, so unless a standard geiger counter...
The discriminant for a monic polynomial having only the free term { a0 } (and the monic degree term of course) is:
Δn:0 = σ0 nn a0( n - 1 )
where n is the degree of the polynomial, and σk is a sign (i.e., +1 or -1)
while the discriminant for a monic polynomial having only the x1 term (and...
Prove that if ##X## is a topological space, and ##S_i \subset X## is a finite collection of compact subspaces, then their union ##S_1 \cup \cdots \cup S_n## is also compact.
##S_i \subset X## is compact ##\therefore \forall S_i, \exists## a finite open cover ##\mathcal J_i=\{U_j\}_{j\in...
[This is a reference request.]
I'm dissatisfied with the "proofs" I've found so far. E.g., in Kayser's review from 2008, in the paragraph following his eq(1.4), he assumes a propagation amplitude Prop##(\nu_i)## of ##\exp(-im_i \tau_i)##, where "##m_i## is the mass of the ##\nu_i## and...
Gluons are supposed to have precisely 0 rest mass.
However, gluons are always colour confined into hadrons with binding energies of hundreds of MeV.
How is gluons´ lack of rest mass proven?
Presumably through some symmetries, or lack of some processes.
Which kinds of asymmetries and processes...
We have Rayleigh's dissipation function, defined as
##
\mathcal{F}=\frac{1}{2} \sum_{i}\left(k_{x} v_{i x}^{2}+k_{y} v_{i j}^{2}+k_{z} v_{i z}^{2}\right)
##
Also we have transformation equations to generalized coordinates as
##\begin{aligned} \mathbf{r}_{1} &=\mathbf{r}_{1}\left(q_{1}, q_{2}...
Theorem: Let ## f(x), g(x) \in \mathbb{F}[ x] ## by polynomials, s.t. the degree of ## g(x) ## is at least ## 1 ##. Then: there are polynomials ## q(x), r(x) \in \mathbb{F}[ x] ## s.t.
1. ## f(x)=q(x) \cdot g(x)+r(x) ##
or
2. the degree of ## r(x) ## is less than the degree of ## g(x) ##
Proof...
I need help actually creating the proof. I've done the scratch needed for the problem, it's just forming the proof that I need help in.
Bar(a+bi/c+di)= (a-bi) / (c-di)
Bar ((a+bi/c+di)*(c-di/c-di)) = ((a-bi/c-di)*(c+di/c+di))
Bar((ac+bd/c^2 +d^2)+(i(bc-ad)/c^2+d^2)) =...
Let ##S_n## denote ##\{1,\ldots,n\}##, where ##n\in\mathbb{N}##.
Recall that the ##\textrm{sgn}## function maps a permutation of ##S_n## to an element in ##\{1,0,-1\}##.
We want to rework the definition of ##\textrm{sgn}## because it is not sufficient for some proofs about determinants. For...
I'll try to phrase this as clearly as possible but my use of terminology might need to be refined. That may be what ultimately comes of this thread, but hopefully the question as I phrase it will make enough sense. I'm not necessarily asking that a proof be provided, rather, I am interested to...
In Apostol’s Calculus (Pg. 130) they are proving that 1/(x^2) does not have a limit at 0. In the proof, I am unable to understand how they conclude from the fact that the value of f(x) when 0 < x < 1/(A+2) is greater than (A+2)^2 which is greater than A+2 that every neighborhood N(0) contains...
I was attempting to solve the "Sherlock and Cost" problem from HackerRank using DP:
But before I went to come up with a recursive relation, I wanted to find if the problem possesses an optimal substructure, and I was following these steps as written at CLRS book:
Mentor note: Inline images of...
Proof by contradiction (for some reason the LaTeX code is not working for me. Sorry)
Lets assume that A, B, and C are non-zero real numbers; A = B ; and C is not equal to 1.
A/ B = C
A = B x C
But BxC could be equal to B, if and only if C =1
Also, could you recommend a book where I...
Hi,
On this link: https://physicsteacher.in/2020/07/11/the-formula-for-acceleration-due-to-gravity-at-height-h-with-derivation/
They prove the formula for acceleration due to gravity at height h, which is: g1 = g (1 – 2h/R).
There are similar articles online.
When they go through the last...
Given that the partial derivatives of a function ##f(x,y)## exist and are continuous, how can we prove that the following limit
$$\lim_{h\to 0}\frac{f(x+hv_x,y+hv_y)-f(x,y+hv_y)}{h}=v_x\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}(x,y)$$
I can understand why the factor ##v_x## (which is viewed as a constant )...
My attempt to answer this question: Let the actual velocity of wind is $\vec{v}=x\hat{i} + y\hat{j}$ where $\hat{i}$ and $\hat{j} $ represents velocities of 1KM per hour towards east and north respectively. As the person is going northeast with a velocity of 6KM/hr, his actual velocity is $...
For ##N=1##, I have managed to prove this, but for ##N>1##, I am struggling with how to show this. Something that I managed to prove is that
$$\langle\psi |b_k^\dagger=-\langle 0 | \sum_{n=1}^N F_{kn}c_n \prod_{m=1\neq k, l}^N \left(1+b_m F_{ml}c_l \right)$$
which generalizes what I initially...
Hello all, I have a problem related to LU Factorization with my work following it. Would anyone be willing to provide feedback on if my work is a correct approach/answer and help if it needs more work? Thanks in advance.
Problem:
Work:
Sean Carroll says that in SR the time component of the 4-momentum of a particle is its energy. It is of course also ##mc^2dt/d\tau##. He uses that to prove that ##E=mc^2##. Which begs the question why does ##E=p^0##?
Misner, Thorne, Wheeler do roughly the same thing.
I find these 'proofs'...
Are there "nice" ( without heavy machinery) proofs that ## X:=R^2 - \{p,q\} ## is connected? All I can think is using that path-connectedness implies connectedness. So we consider x,y in X and show there is a path joining them. I am looking for an argument at undergrad level, so that I would not...
Here we talk about how we come to the formulas for PCA and Kernel PCA. We briefly introduce kernel functions, and talk about feature spaces. This builds on the introductory lecture for PCA and also that for Kernel PCA.
Part A)
For part A I forgo breaking down the identity into it's component x, y, and z parts, and just take the r derivative treating r' as a constant vector. This seems to give the right answer, but to be entirely honest I'm not sure how I'd go about doing this component by component. I figure...
As an aside, fresh_42 commented and I made an error in my post that is now fixed. His comment, below, is not valid (my fault), in that THIS post is now fixed.Assume s and w are components of vectors, both in the same frame
Assume S and W are skew symmetric matrices formed from the vector...
Ok I am trying to brush up my real analysis skills so that I can study some topology and measure theory at some point.
I found this theorem in my notes, that is proven by using proof by contradiction. However, I have a hard time understanding what the contradiction really is...
Here is the...
Let $\,a>0\,,\,a\neq1\,$ be a real number. We can prove by using the continuity of $\ln n$ function that $\;\lim\limits_{n\to\infty}\dfrac{\log_an}n=0\;$
However, this problem appears in my problems book quite early right after the definition of $\epsilon$-language definition of limit of a...
Chapter 1, Section 1.1.
Look at the picture. Question 57.
Let me see.
To show this prove, I must find the midpoint of the diagonals. The midpoint of (b, c) and (a, 0) must be the same as the midpoint of (0, 0) and
(a + b, c).
You say?
Sorry if there's latex errors. My internet connection is so bad I can't preview.
Here's the wikipedia proof I'm referring to. I'm fine with the steps up to $$W(x,0) = W_0 (x) [1 + \beta f_0 (x(0) - \langle x \rangle_0) ]$$ where ##W(x,t)## is the probability density of finding the system at...
The articles:
https://lmcs.episciences.org/5328/pdf
http://argo.matf.bg.ac.rs/publications/2013/2013-icga-krk-sat.pdf
http://archive.ceciis.foi.hr/app/public/conferences/1/papers2012/dkb3.pdf
KRK endgame is a win for white regardless of starting position, with the trivial drawing exception in...
Venturi effect is known for centuries. And most probably that's why experimental proofs are rare because it's already accepted. But, I want to know how close real results are in case of experiments regarding Venturi Effect. I am especially interested in results of experiment regarding velocity...
Hello,
I was wondering how to prove that the Binomial Series is not infinite when k is a non-negative integer. I really don't understand how we can prove this. Do you have any examples that can show that there is a finite number when k is a non-negative integer?
Thank you!
It is an electron initially pushed by the action of the electric field. The vectors of force and velocity are parallel to each other.
Here's the questionA possible expression of speed as a function of time is the following:
$$v(t) = \frac{At}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{At}{c})^2}}$$where is it $$A...
It is an electron initially pushed by the action of the electric field. The vectors of force and velocity are parallel to each other.
Here's the questionA possible expression of speed as a function of time is the following:
$$v(t) = \frac{At}{\sqrt{1 + (\frac{At}{c})^2}}$$where is it $$A...
If ##f## is a constant function, then choose any point ##x_0##. For any ##x\in K##, ##f(x_0)\geq f(x)## and there is a point ##x_0\in K## s.t. ##f(x_0)=\sup f(K)=\sup\{f(x_0)\}=f(x_0)##.
Now assume that ##f## is not a constant function.
Construct a sequence of points ##x_n\in K## as follows...
Hi all. I'm trying to prove energy conservation in a (maybe) uncommon way. I know there are different ways to do this, but it is asked me to prove it this way and I'm stucked at the end of the proof. I'm considering ##N## bodies moving in a gravitational potential, such that the energy is ##E =...
I'm trying to prove Plancherel's theorem for functions $$f\in L^1\cap L^2(\mathbb{R})$$. I've included below my attempt and I would really appreciate it if someone could check this for me please, and give me any feedback they might have.
**Note:** I am working with a slightly different...
I've started by writing down the definitions, so we have
$$x_n-y_n\rightarrow 0\, \Rightarrow \, \forall w>0, \exists \, n_w\in\mathbb{N}:n>n_{w}\,\Rightarrow\,|x_n-y_n|<w $$
$$(x_n)\, \text{is Cauchy} \, \Rightarrow \,\forall w>0, \exists \, n_0\in\mathbb{N}:m,n>n_{0}\,\Rightarrow\,|x_m-x_n|<w...
Use the epsilon-delta method to show that the limit is 3/2 for the given function.
lim (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) = 3/2
x-->1
I want to find a delta so that | x - 1| < delta implies |f(x) - L| < epsilon.
| (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) - (3/2) | < epsilon
-epsilon < (1 + 2x)/(3 - x) - 3/2 < epsilon
I now add...
Forgive me, I am not a probability guy, so I am unsure how well known this is. I was trying to figure something out and found this. I found it cool.
Here's the explanation.
The first solution is a fraction (damn scanner!)
Oops! From Kendall Geometrical Probability (1963)
Not sure if this is an allowed post, as it is not technically math but I'm trying to work through the below proof.
If workers have a fundamental right to a job, then unemployment will be virtually nonexistent but job redundancy will become a problem. If workers have no fundamental right to a...
I tried to understand proof of this identity from electromagnetics. but I was puzzled at the last expression.
why is that line integral of dV = 0 ?
In fact, I'm wondering if this expression makes sense.
First I quote the text, and then the attempts to solve the doubts:
"Proof of the Chain Rule
Be ##f## a differentiable function at the point ##u=g(x)##, with ##g## a differentiable function at ##x##. Be the function ##E(k)## described this way:
$$E(0)=0$$...
Theorem: Show that the sequence ## a_n = (-1)^n ## for all ## n \in \mathbb{N}, ## does not converge.
My Proof: Suppose that there exists a limit ##L## such that ## a_n \rightarrow L ##. Specifically, for ## \epsilon = 1 ## there exists ## n_0 ## s.t. for all ## n > n_0## then ##|(-1)^n-L|<1##...