Calculating Copper Wire Gauge for Resistance Thermometer Bridge Circuit

In summary: It is correct to say α=0.0042. Δt=(202-200)=2. R_t = 112Ω at 20°C. Punching in the figures = 0.9408Ω. 0.9408Ω/250 = 0.0037632Ω/m^-1. From properties of resistance table, SWG12 is too low, so......you should be using SWG16 instead.
  • #1
calcphonup
4
0
a. The resistance thermometer bridge circuit shown in FIGURE 1 has a designed maximum temperature of 200°C, ignoring the effects of connecting wire resistance. If the connecting loop is 250 m determine the smallest gauge (swg) of copper wire which must be used if the indicated maximum temperature is to be less than 202°C.

The temperature coefficient of resistance of the thermometer is 0.0042 °C–1 and the resistance of the thermometer is 112 Ω at 20°C. Assume the connecting leads are at 20°C.

b. Using the gauge of copper wire calculated in part (a), calculate the maximum indicated temperature using a 3-wire system (as shown in FIGURE 2) over a distance of 125 m.Relevant EquationsRt = R0(1 + at)

R1RT = R2RS

R = pL/A = Resistance = (Resistivity) x Length of wire / cross-sectional area

A = (pi x d2) / 4

d = squareroot(4A /pi)
1557675546003-png.png

1557675556199-png.png

1557675564142-png.png


R_t=R_20×(1+α×∆t)
α=0.0042
R20 = 112Ω
∆t=202-20=182
R_t=R_20×(1+α×∆t)
R_t=112×(1+0.0042×182)
R_t= 197.6128

As both resistors on figure 1 are 150Ω, they cancel each other out.
Find the resistivity of copper at 20°C

ρ=RA÷L
Where:
R = Resistance of copper at 20°C
A = area
L = length
From the properties of resistance wires table:
When diameter = 0.376mm, resistance = 0.155m-1
0.376mm diameter = 0.11103645mm2 for the area.
Converting resistance to per mm = 0.000155m-1
For length 1m = 1000mm.

Therefore, ρ=0.000155×0.111036450÷1000=1.72×10^(-8)
Resistivity of copper wire at 20°C = 1.72×10^(-8)Ωm-1
To find the area the equation would be A=(ρ×L)/R
A=(1.72×10^(-5) Ωmm×250000mm)/197.6128Ω
A = 0.02176mm2

Find diameter = 0.16645mm

Too small of a diameter.

Any help would be greatly appreciated. Ive been stuck for a week

Moderator note: Moved from a technical forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hello @calcphonup ,
:welcome: ##\qquad ## !​

For the bridge circuit you have a relationship , I suppose that's what you mean with R1RT = R2RS ?

Where in your essay is ##R_4## ? Is the value given ?

Your calculation gives me the impression that you start out with a diameter and then calculate another diameter. What is the intention ?

[edit]It's really worthwhile to learn some ##\LaTeX## (link at lower left of the edit box). ##R_1 R_t = R_2 R_S## looks a lot better than R1RT = R2RS But you want to at least use subscripts (toolbar) R1 Rt = R2RS. No clue what ##R_S## is ... :rolleyes:
You sure this is the right equation for the circuit shown ? Shouldn't it have ##R_4## somewhere ?

##\ ##
 
  • #3
In other words R_s is the position of the slidewire tapper – is a measure of the resistance (and therefore the temperature) of the resistance thermometer. So for figure 2, R_S = R_4. However, I have not made it passed part (a) of the question yet where I am only using figure 1. I am not sure which route I should be going down. Should I be trying to find a diameter and reference the table to find my SWG or should I be trying to find the Ωm-1 of copper at 20degrees and then using the table?
 
  • #4
calcphonup said:
I have not made it passed part (a) of the question
Does this mean that you finished part (a) or that you are still stuck in part (a) :rolleyes:
I am under the impression that you are still stuck, right ?

OK, so for figure 1 you have an equilibrium condition ##R_1\,R_t = R_2\,R_s## and with ##R_1=R_2## this becomes ##R_s = R_t##.

The information
calcphonup said:
has a designed maximum temperature of 200°C, ignoring the effects of connecting wire resistance
can then be used to find ##R_s = 200 \ \Omega## as you did. The maximum value of ##R_S##, when the slider is at the top end, that is.
(or ##198 \ \Omega## if you think 2.5 digit accuracy is justified -- I would certainly agree). Never ever omit units ! and do the calculations with ##197.6128 \ \Omega##).

I must admit that I find it hard to interpret the exact problem statement in part (a) (is this the exact formulation ?) because with such a value of ##R_S## the indicated temperature is never more than 200 °C.

The way I would compose this exercise would be something like 'determine the smallest gauge ... if the indicated temperature is less than 202 °C when the actual temperature of the thermistor is 200 °C'

Then the 250 m of connecting wire should have a resistance of less than ##\alpha \,\Delta T\, R_t = 0.9408 \ \Omega ## and that lets you find a gauge.

---

Moving on to figure 2 (and to complicate things ##R_s=R_4## :wink:) is now in order. What is the equilibrium condition ?

##\ ##
 
  • #5
BvU said:
Does this mean that you finished part (a) or that you are still stuck in part (a)
I am stuck on part (a) as you correctly assumed.

BvU said:
Then the 250 m of connecting wire should have a resistance of less than αΔTRt=0.9408 Ω and that lets you find a gauge.
So is it correct to say α=0.0042. Δt=(202-200)=2. R_t = 112Ω at 20°C. Punching in the figures = 0.9408Ω. 0.9408Ω/250 = 0.0037632Ω/m^-1. From properties of resistance table, SWG12 is too low, so SWG 14 must be used? Is that correct?
 
  • #6
BvU said:
Moving on to figure 2 (and to complicate things Rs=R4 :wink:) is now in order. What is the equilibrium condition ?
As far as part (b) goes, I am not sure where to start? Other than the total resistance of the wire is 0.00532Ω/m(from the table)*125 = 0.665Ω. However, that is at 20 degrees and the resistance will increase with the temperature.
 
  • #7
BvU said:
hard to interpret the exact problem statement in part (a) (is this the exact formulation ?)
...
Moving on to figure 2 ... What is the equilibrium condition ?

Wrt #5: I'm not clearvoyant and not the exercise composer. It's your exercise, so your judgment prevails. I do agree with your calculations.

Wrt #6:
calcphonup said:
Assume the connecting leads are at 20°C.
##\ ##
 

1. What is the purpose of calculating copper wire gauge for a resistance thermometer bridge circuit?

The purpose of calculating the copper wire gauge is to determine the appropriate size of wire needed to minimize resistance and ensure accurate temperature readings in the resistance thermometer bridge circuit.

2. How is copper wire gauge calculated for a resistance thermometer bridge circuit?

Copper wire gauge is calculated using the formula: gauge = (0.127 * (D^2) * L)/R, where D is the wire diameter in mils, L is the length of the wire in feet, and R is the desired resistance in ohms.

3. What factors should be considered when selecting the copper wire gauge for a resistance thermometer bridge circuit?

The factors to consider include the length of the wire, the desired resistance, the maximum current that will flow through the wire, and the temperature range of the circuit. These factors will affect the wire's resistance and its ability to accurately measure temperature.

4. Can I use a smaller copper wire gauge than the calculated size for a resistance thermometer bridge circuit?

In most cases, it is not recommended to use a smaller wire gauge than the calculated size. This can result in increased resistance, which can affect the accuracy of temperature readings. It is best to stick to the calculated size or use a larger gauge if necessary.

5. Are there any other considerations when selecting copper wire for a resistance thermometer bridge circuit?

Yes, it is important to ensure that the copper wire is of high quality and has good conductivity. The wire should also be able to withstand the temperature range of the circuit without melting or degrading. It is also recommended to use stranded wire instead of solid wire to reduce the effects of thermal expansion and contraction.

Similar threads

  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
874
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top