Charge distribution and potential in a 1-dimensional quasistatic syste

In summary, the potential and charge distribution for a 1-dimensional system with a charge distribution ρ(x) and speed v(x) can be calculated in the quasistatic limit, where dt/dt=0, using the Poisson equation, continuity equation, and energy conservation equation. The resulting equation can be simplified to a form of f^{\prime\prime}+kf^{-1/2}=0, but the square root of -4k may not always be real.
  • #1
christianpoved
15
0

Homework Statement



suppose you have an 1-dimensional system with a charge distribution ##\rho(x)## (not given) moving with an speed ##v(x)##, calculate the potential ##\phi(x)## and the charge distribution ##\rho(x)## in the quasistatic limit ##\frac{d}{dt}=0##.

Homework Equations



##\frac{d^{2} \phi}{dx^{2}}=-\rho/ \varepsilon_{0}## (Poisson equation)

##j=\rho v##

##\frac{d}{dx}(\rho v)=0## (Continuity equation)

##\frac{1}{2} mv^{2}=q\phi## (Energy Conservation)

The Attempt at a Solution


From the energy conservation equation we get that
$$\frac{1}{v}=\sqrt{\frac{m}{2q}} \phi^{-1/2}$$
Continuity equation tells us that ##j## is constant, then
$$ \rho = \frac{j}{v}=j\sqrt{\frac{m}{2q}} \phi^{-1/2}$$
Using Laplace equation
$$-\varepsilon_{0}\frac{d^{2} \phi}{dx^{2}}=j\sqrt{\frac{m}{2q}} \phi^{-1/2}$$
Then
$$\frac{d^{2} \phi}{dx^{2}}+\frac{j}{\varepsilon_{0}}\sqrt{\frac{m}{2q}} \phi^{-1/2}=0$$
This is just an equation of the form
$$ f^{\prime\prime}+kf^{-1/2}=0$$
Multiplying by ##f^{\prime}## and integrating
$$ \int f^{\prime}f^{\prime\prime}dx+k\int f^{\prime}f^{-1/2}dx=0$$
$$ \frac{1}{2}(f^{\prime})^2+2k\sqrt{f}=0$$
$$ (f^{\prime})^2=-4k\sqrt{f}$$
$$ f^{\prime}=\sqrt{-4k} f^{1/4}$$
And here is my problem, i have the ##\sqrt{-4k}## that in general is not real!
$$ \frac{df}{f^{1/4}}=\sqrt{-4k}dx $$
$$ \frac{4}{3} f^{3/4}=\sqrt{-4k}x +C $$
$$ f={\frac{3}{4}[\sqrt{-4k}x +C]}^{4/3} $$
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
christianpoved said:
##\frac{1}{2} mv^{2}=q\phi## (Energy Conservation)
Both v and ϕ depend on x here. And I would expect that m, if necessary at all, depends on x as well.

I am not sure if you are supposed to consider a time-dependent ρ apart from the uniform motion, I think you do not have to. Just use ρ(x) and v(x) as unknown but constant functions. Then there is no motion where you would have to consider conservation laws.
 

1. What is charge distribution in a 1-dimensional quasistatic system?

Charge distribution refers to the arrangement of positive and negative charges in a 1-dimensional quasistatic system. This can be represented by a charge density function, which describes the amount of charge per unit length along the system.

2. How is charge distribution related to potential in a 1-dimensional quasistatic system?

In a 1-dimensional quasistatic system, the charge distribution determines the electric potential at any point along the system. This is because the potential is directly proportional to the charge density, with a higher density resulting in a stronger potential.

3. Can the charge distribution in a 1-dimensional quasistatic system change over time?

No, in a quasistatic system, the charge distribution remains constant as it is assumed to reach equilibrium. This means that the charges are arranged in a way that minimizes the potential energy of the system, and any changes would require an external force or energy.

4. How does the length of the 1-dimensional quasistatic system affect the charge distribution and potential?

The length of the system does not affect the charge distribution, as it is determined by the charge density function. However, a longer system would result in a larger potential difference between the ends, as the potential is directly proportional to the length of the system.

5. What is the difference between a 1-dimensional quasistatic system and a 1-dimensional dynamic system?

In a quasistatic system, the charges are assumed to be at rest and the system is in equilibrium, while in a dynamic system, the charges are constantly moving and the system is not in equilibrium. This results in different charge distributions and potentials for the two systems.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
19
Views
841
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
402
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
451
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
513
Replies
1
Views
812
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
385
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top