- #281
Studiot
- 5,440
- 9
Edit
I think OE is working it just gives an error message because there is not recipient.
I think OE is working it just gives an error message because there is not recipient.
Greg Bernhardt said:for those having odd/serious mathjax problems run this script and then click the email results button
https://www.physicsforums.com/mathjax/mjp.html
Borek said:No, looks like it can get different - now LaTeX was processed, but Opera still waits for servers.
Borek said:Usual pattern looks more like this.
(And when I want to show this 15 sec timeout everything works perfectly, why should it not?)
You can fix it now by using TeX-AMS_HTML instead of TeX-AMS-MML_HTMLorMML.Greg Bernhardt said:The devs are aware of this problem and say an update will be released in the next week that should resolve it.
You could also change this behavior Fredrik saw by setting processEnvironments to false in the tex2jax parameters. On the other hand, perhaps you'd prefer MathJax, like TeX, to process anything between \begin and \end as math without needing to type in delimiters.Fredrik said:The main reason why that idea bothers me a little is that $$math$$ has the same effect as
math
in a LaTeX document, i.e. it has the same effect as tex tags here.
Uhh...I don't know why MathJax turns that into an image. Click quote to see what I typed.
I never use that button, but I would guess that it's both possible and preferable to replace it with two buttons, one for itex and one for tex.Redbelly98 said:Can we make it so clicking the [PLAIN]https://www.physicsforums.com/products/latexreference/images/Icon3.gif icon inserts itex tags instead of tex? I'm finding a lot of new members using tex for LaTeX code that is supposed to be inline with their text, and it is breaking up expressions into multiple lines.
Fredrik said:I never use that button, but I would guess that it's both possible and preferable to replace it with two buttons, one for itex and one for tex.
***** said:Homework Statement
Three sinusoidal waves of the same frequency travel along a string in the positive direction of an x axis. Their amplitudes are y1, y1/3.0, and y1/4.0, and their phase constants are 0, [tex]\pi[/tex]/4.0, and [tex]\pi[/tex], respectively. What are (a) the ratio of the amplitude to y1 and (b) the phase constant of the resultant wave?
chroot said:Greg, is there anything I can do to help?
- Warren
Borek said:Good point. I don't know LaTeX well enough, but I guess k_i_j is ambiguous, should it be [itex]k_{ij}[/itex] or [itex]k_{i_j}[/itex]?
I haven't checked everything, just skimmed, could be there are more errors.
Borek said:No matter what was intended, it was wrong, as (aq) should be not a subscript, that's a common mistake. If memory serves me well [itex]H_2SO_{4}(aq)[/itex] is the correct notation (although I am not sure at the moment whether it should or shouldn't be italicized).
Borek said:Wikipedia is wrong and repeats a common mistake that state of aggregation should be written as a subscript. It shouldn't be. There is only one decisive source of information here, http://www.iupac.org/reports/provisional/abstract05/GreenBook051206_prs.pdf , General Chemistry section, Other symbols and conventions in chemistry (2.10.1), (vi) States of aggregation.
Note: could be there is already a newer version of Green Book, I just copied/pasted what I posted several years ago at CF.
I like Serena said:Btw, wikipedia now says: "An aqueous solution is a solution in which the solvent is water. It is usually shown in chemical equations by appending aq to the relevant formula."
(Next time wikipedia will be right!)
Redbelly98 said:The PF Library is still using the old LaTeX processor. Could that be updated to MathJax?